Well,
The first one , definitely blurry , the front half seems weird to me looks painted on , a perfect candidate of perhaps noise reduction tools being used.
the Fokker is most definitely blurry , I'd suggest maybe not uploading at 1600 pixels , perhaps 1024 max if its a lil blurry and can't be fixed , 1600 pixels wide have to be almost immaculate to be accpeted as ever detail stands out on the aircraft , so does every defect.
The SQ bank almost looks heat distorted and blurry to me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Undersharpened, I need some help
Collapse
X
-
I think there soft but the screener feels they can't be fixed... I'd also like to have shot at editing some.
Leave a comment:
-
Can you link the origs. here or somewhere.
I'd like to give it a shot later when I get home.
Leave a comment:
-
Undersharpened, I need some help
My last four submissions were all rejected for being blurry/undersharpened. I just received a new hi-res monitor and the pictures are quite sharp on my new screen up to a point that sharpening them even more will give some jaggies. So, I wonder if it is the screen and I have to adjust my workflow a bit.
Can you give me some feedback on the following pictures. I hope I can save them. They were all rejected for being undersharpened/blurry. The two banking shots were also rejected for being digitally manipulated (?):
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Thanks!
Roel.Tags: None
Leave a comment: