I Hate To Be Mean But...

[Crunk415balla]

I think the second looks even better than the first IMO.

[LX-A343]

Yep, we do make mistakes, but the first shot in the original post was correctly accepted IMO. It's a great shot, as mentioned many times already. Even the second one is still acceptable IMO. But of course, we can have a closer looks at some photos and raise the bar. No problems

Gerardo

[RingwaySam]

I don't think the screeners can win either way. They accept the shot and people post asking why they have been accepted and when there rejected you obviously get people moaning.

TBH I think they do a great job and I suppose they do make mistakes from time to time.

[sluger020889]

So you took the time to go through this guys photos and continue to question if they belong in the DB????? Maybe you should spend more time worrying about critiquing your own photos!I didn't see any 1/25th shots in your collection.....show us how its done then!!!!

[Will M]

-

In future If you have an issue with a photo, it would be more tasteful to contact the admin crew or senior screeners and bring it to their attention rather than name and shame on a public forum.

[Crism]

Let me light the flame under my own ass even more...
I was looking at some of his other photos (most of which are nice like the LAX sunset shots and a couple of his other motion blur shots) but then I came to this one...

[photoid=5736624]

I mean come on now. Sure there's motion blur but look at the tail and the reg! NOT TO MENTION HOW NOT IN THE CENTER OF THE FRAME THIS THING IS.

flame away! (It spices things up around here hehe)

[Will M]

We're giving the consistency 110% Dave , believe me , but we're never gonna get it right 100% of the time , the 2 vote = and add system is about as fair as it's gonna get I'm afraid.

I kinda agree with you in some respects but it's actually you guys that set the standards and raise the bar for yourselves , continually pushing your own limits and striving towards the personal satisfaction of getting better and better.

[Top_Gun]

I think it looks nice, but was it needed to make a thread questioning weither or not someone's photo should have made it past the screening? If the screeners added it, they feel its acceptable, and that is all that matters.

I think the question he raises is valid. Screeners shouldn't be the one applying their standards, they should all be going by the sites standards. It gets very frustrating when you get all these rejections when you can point out just as many pics in the DB that have the same exact issues as your rejections.

All we're asking for is consistancy, if screeners have their own guidelines, then the site screening policy isn't consistant

[Crunk415balla]

I think it looks nice, but was it needed to make a thread questioning weither or not someone's photo should have made it past the screening? If the screeners added it, they feel its acceptable, and that is all that matters.

[brianw999]

I bloody well wish I could swing a 50 - 500 at 1/25th and get a pic like that.

...come to think of it?....I wish I HAD a 50 - 500. LOL.

Bloody good pic...and BTW, I don't like this kind of post either.

[MaxPower]

And that said, if the person wants to do this, its still his ass (the threadstarter) who will get the rant, coz nobody does agree with the poster anyway .... Like this thread has turned out too. Like predicted. I wouldnt want another member question why the hell did it get in (if the viewer didnt liked it) So what.. I didnt shot the image for YOU anyway. I hope somebody gets my point here.

[BA747-436]

In future If you have an issue with a photo, it would be more tasteful to contact the admin crew or senior screeners and bring it to their attention rather than name and shame on a public forum.

[RingwaySam]

[photoid=5739545]

Now that's an awesome panning shot!!!

[MaxPower]

I hate topics when people pick out photographs of not the greatest quality. It is a really unique shot and its a change from a motionless side shot. I took one kind of simular with simular quality issues

Thumbnail code

[photoid=xxxxxxx]
=
[photoid=5736743]

[ualwillstand]

I hate topics when people pick out photographs of not the greatest quality. It is a really unique shot and its a change from a motionless side shot. I took one kind of simular with simular quality issues.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5736743