Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Im confused with this and new rejection reason!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Im confused with this and new rejection reason!

    Hi all,

    I had this rejected yesterday and I am rather annoyed. Ok it may have other things wrong with it but overprocessed????? What the hell is this?

    Can anyone justify just so that I know how to edit within the margins of this rejection reason. Can a screener say what parts of this photo are overprocessed so I know please thanks

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1009150

    Dom - Capital Aviation Photography

  • #2
    Dom, I think its just a bad crop, crop closer to where the wing hits the fuselage.

    Comment


    • #3
      Why isn't it bad crop then? That processing reason is poor!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by LHR-Domi
        Why isn't it bad crop then? That processing reason is poor!
        Im just saying what I think, someone from the crew will probably reply.

        Comment


        • #5
          Cheers mate much appreciated

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Dominic,

            i'm not sure, but maybe the grass gave you the rejection. It looks
            pretty weird at some points. Did you clone anything out? Or maybe
            a bit too much NeatImage?

            Thomas




            Comment


            • #7
              Taken from the new upload guidelines....

              Overprocessed
              This rejection may apply to photos which simply look overprocessed. This can be for example an improper use of noise removal programs up to the result of getting a plastic like look or smufgy edges. Also, halos caused by wrong sharpening settings or other wrong post processing settings, will result in a rejection.
              Personally the photo doesn't look too bad to me

              Anyway hope that helps

              Dale

              Comment


              • #8
                No Neat Image. no nothing lol no cloning

                Thanks for the comment Dale! Below is the original resized to 1200x800 and compressed.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Oh great it got rejected in the Appeal, stupid!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Have you considered that the halos are the reason for the reject. You can clearly spot the difference between the uploaded pic and the original, when you look at the head of the lamp post. Original fine, upload has some light halos.
                    There is also a viisble halo around parts of the plane.
                    My photo editing guide - updated and improved Feb. 2010
                    My Nikon D100,D200,D300, D800, D7200 basic spotting settings guide
                    ACIG - the best resource for military aviation information

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I didn't screen the photo, but there is white halos around the top of the lightpoles and on the top of the building to the left. There is also a dark shadow/halo running along side the top of the fuselage. And that is why it got the - Over Processed / Bad postprocessing rejection. So I guess its not that stupid after all!

                      Soren
                      Regards
                      Soren Madsen

                      Spotting guide to CPH www.cphaviation.dk

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So I take it Jid Webb's excellent guide to editing isn't acceptable then? So what can I do to stop this overprocessing on that photo because I have not used dodge tool, or selecting brightening on areas. I have just done levels sharpening saturation?

                        Cheers Dom

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You might have used the shadow/highlight tool ?
                          My photo editing guide - updated and improved Feb. 2010
                          My Nikon D100,D200,D300, D800, D7200 basic spotting settings guide
                          ACIG - the best resource for military aviation information

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Perhaps I did use shadow/highlight actually which could have caused this but then therefore if this type of editing is not allowed why is it promoted? Or is it only allowed to a certain extent?

                            Cheers Dom

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well, you can use that function, but if you create visible halos with it, then you have over-processed the pic.
                              I personaly prefer using curves, as they achieve the same, while not creating halos.
                              My photo editing guide - updated and improved Feb. 2010
                              My Nikon D100,D200,D300, D800, D7200 basic spotting settings guide
                              ACIG - the best resource for military aviation information

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X