If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My first shot was rejected for being unsoft. So I opened up the same pic, gave it 25% USM and resubmitted. Now it was rejected for having jpg compression????
If I didn't resize the image, how could it be compressed.....
I did try to appeal the compression one because I don't understand how it could be compressed. I hate appealing shots, but some times I just can't understand it so I come here an "vent". Most of the times I totally see the rejection and just move on.
I was afraid to start from scratch on the original because then it would just lead to new rejections. Maybe I just need to lay low for a while, could have ticked off the new screeners
haha doubt it mate , your entitled to your say like everyone else , you came to right thread so I can't really complain
But I'd reccomend reworking it form scratch or else ur editing and already edited photo which will lead to more rejections
the first one i rejected and i'm sure i put compression in it also?!?! have a look at the sky, it looks like a chess board or a jigsaw, you need to save the image at the highest quality to avoid compression. it is indeed soft also.
the first one i rejected and i'm sure i put compression in it also?!?! have a look at the sky, it looks like a chess board or a jigsaw, you need to save the image at the highest quality to avoid compression. it is indeed soft also.
Here is your first rejection, which just shows the softness only.
I haven't changed the way I've saved my work, I've been using JID's method for some time now and was on a nice roll until recently. Yet the rejection rate has more than doubled since the new screeners have come on board. .
It appears I'm not the only one who's noticed this either
Here is your first rejection, which just shows the softness only.
I haven't changed the way I've saved my work, I've been using JID's method for some time now and was on a nice roll until recently. Yet the rejection rate has more than doubled since the new screeners have come on board. .
It appears I'm not the only one who's noticed this either
just wanted to show the states to prove it.
i'm not a new screener... the image is soft which was correct reason and the 2nd is compressed. whoever screened the image behind me obviously saw what i saw, soft image.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment