Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does the sky looks some kind of noisy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The original looks underexposed to me. No wonder, with an exp. comp. og -1.33 (!!). With my 20D I usually use +0.33, with the D60 +0.33/0.66.

    Was that shot in RAW or JPG mode? If JPG, which mode exactly? I agree, that ~700kb for a pic of such a size is rather small.

    Gerardo
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by LX-A343
      The original looks underexposed to me. No wonder, with an exp. comp. og -1.33 (!!). With my 20D I usually use +0.33, with the D60 +0.33/0.66.

      Was that shot in RAW or JPG mode? If JPG, which mode exactly? I agree, that ~700kb for a pic of such a size is rather small.

      Gerardo
      Hi,

      I agree, if I look on, it looks rather underexposed.
      As Gerardo said, I was using -1.33 "exp. comp. og". I thought, if I would leave it on "0" ,the pic could look overexposed due to the strong sun.
      Thx for this tip. I wonīt do this in the future...

      Pic was taken in JPG mode. I used the quality setting "L".
      I downsized the size of the pic because I had to upload it to imagehack.us.
      Itīs normaly over 2Mb big.

      Philipp

      Click Here to view my aircraft photos at Planepictures.net
      Click Here to view my aircraft photos at Airliners.net

      Comment


      • #18
        Did you use "L (Large fine)" or "L "Large normal)"?

        Gerardo
        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by LX-A343
          Did you use "L (Large fine)" or "L "Large normal)"?

          Gerardo
          I use the left one, so "Large Fine".

          Philipp

          Click Here to view my aircraft photos at Planepictures.net
          Click Here to view my aircraft photos at Airliners.net

          Comment

          Working...
          X