Had this rejected

[AlanF]

Hi Guys

Had this rejected today for heat haze i assume its the haze from the engines but also similar pic uploaded advice plz
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1130106

This is the other pic but i dont think they are similar
[photoid=5809919]

[Crazy764]

Too taxi shots of the same plane on the same day are considered similar.

As for the heat haze, it's not from the engines. It's visible all across both wings and on the cheat line along the nose.

[YYZPICS]

Why would you wanna upload two taxi shots anyways?, its also not centered

[Billsville]

Alan, Thats pretty close to similar, two taxi pics not too far apart.

The heat haze in question is in front of the engine exhaust. Note the edges of the engines and the landing gear. The heat haze from the engines wouldn't affect those parts. Must be heat haze from a previous craft or the tarmac heat haze.

Hope this helps

Steve Brown

[AlanF]

thx for the explanations i will keep it for my own pleasure

Alan

[stu2ii2]

This is what i consider similar photo upload [photoid=24805]
[photoid=24803]
How did this get through?

[G-DALE]

Stu,

You have to remember that those photos were uploaded in January 03. A hell of alot has changed since then.

Cheers,

Dale

[stu2ii2]

Ok, no probs Dale.

[Meekel]

Stu,

You have to remember that those photos were uploaded in January 03. A hell of alot has changed since then.

Cheers,

Dale

Aren't the photos identical? Or is it just me?

[RingwaySam]

Aren't the photos identical? Or is it just me?

Possibly the photographer uploaded the same photo by accident... It was quite easy to make mistakes a few years back, now it's hard to because you can delete queued photo's.

[G-DALE]

On the screening page we're now able to see other photos which the photographer has in the database, queue and had rejected of the same reg, the same reg and location or the same reg location and date, therefore it's much easier. Hence why Alan's photo was rejected.

Cheers,

Dale

[stu2ii2]

Hi Dale
Are you telling us that if we already got a reg in our photogs database that the pic will be rejected anyways?
Thanks

Stu

[G-DALE]

Not at all Stu, I apologise if it came across that way It's just for reference more than anything. It goes to show though that in Alan's case it was handy for the screeners to know he already had a photo in the database which was snapped within minutes of the other one.

Cheers,

Dale

[stu2ii2]

Ok, Dale. Thanks for clarifying that little question of mine.

Stu

[G-DALE]

Anytime Stu

Cheers,

Dale