Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help with rejected Cargolux photo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BA747-436
    replied
    for future referance please check the sticky topics at the top of this thread...

    Leave a comment:


  • dheald
    replied
    Thank you Wallace and Gerardo. I used your suggestions and re-uploaded it.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=1205367

    Dean

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    I tried that selective sharpening mentioned by Wallace on your photo. USM settings were 300 / 0.2 / 2. The result was perfect IMO. Give it a try. I spent less than a minute

    Gerardo

    Leave a comment:


  • wwshack
    replied
    Interesting one there. It looked like the forward fuselage and engines were soft.

    Try some selective sharpening on the forward fuselage and engines, this was the tutorial that I learned the technique from http://www.ophrysphotography.co.uk/p...sharpening.htm
    It looks complicated but with practice it can be done very quickly.

    It may boil down to a depth of field problem, the sun angle looks to be reasonably low so perhaps your camera was set on speed priority and it selected a wide aperture?
    If you are a Canon user, Canon's Zoombrowser EX has a facility where you can inspect which AF points were selected, this feature comes in very handy at my photo postmortems.

    Personally speaking it is a nice picture, a nice impression of taking off into the sunset.

    Leave a comment:


  • dheald
    started a topic Help with rejected Cargolux photo

    Help with rejected Cargolux photo

    This photo was rejected for Underharpeend (soft):

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1199567

    Can any of the screeners provide comments or help?

    Thanks in advance,
    Dean
Working...
X