Deletion request

[phtr88]

So this site accepts rubbish?!!

Gee thanks, thats a real compliment for the rest of us.

Cīmon...I didnīt meant it this way!
I said that I took rubbish (thatīs what I say now, back in 2004 I was happy to have pics online at all )....

Furthermore the standarts for uploading have changed now...So jp.net didnīt accept rubbish...

@AJ: Thanks for removing the pic.

Philipp

[AJ]

They have been removed.

[cja]

Rubbish

The first two shots were taken in 2004 when I was unexperienced and uploaded each rubbish I took.....
Philipp

So this site accepts rubbish?!!

Gee thanks, thats a real compliment for the rest of us.

[phtr88]

Thanks guys for your replies.
Even if these pics show my development in aviation pictures they are now needless...As already written above the reason for uploading these shots was the fact to have some pics online at an online database...no other incitement
Request a deletion was never so difficult...once there was even an extra thread for this....

so please, donīt let me beg....

Philipp
P.S.: These deletions will be my last ones

[meneses24]

Re-upload it then change the date etc...

That's the same I talked about before, but the deal is that when you get accepted the re-uploaded shots, they're going to be at i.e page 34 of all my pictures. So no one will see them

[RingwaySam]

I totally agree, however I do feel that when new shots are rejected as 'Similar' any older shot preventing the shot from been online maybe deleted (via a request to the admins). Mainly due to increased quality (new equipment and favourable shooting conditions).

Re-upload it then change the date etc...

[Paul Maier]

What is it with peoples obsession with average view numbers, number of pics in database etc. ?

For goodness sake, it's not a competition.

Brian, im stirring, i should though have been slightly more direct.

I think its a joke that he is asking to have things deleted.

But seeing you bring up the fact that the numbers are there etc...that is the reasoning for the mentality of competition...to eliminate that, you would have to remove all the statistics from publication.

[meneses24]

Quote:
Originally Posted by RingwaySam
It's always good to look back and see have you've improved imho.



I totally agree, however I do feel that when new shots are rejected as 'Similar' any older shot preventing the shot from been online maybe deleted (via a request to the admins). Mainly due to increased quality (new equipment and favourable shooting conditions).

http://www.jetphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=34810

The same thing I posted almost a year ago, and suddenly this morning got alive again

[v1images]

It's always good to look back and see have you've improved imho.

I totally agree, however I do feel that when new shots are rejected as 'Similar' any older shot preventing the shot from been online maybe deleted (via a request to the admins). Mainly due to increased quality (new equipment and favourable shooting conditions).

Deleting shots just because you dont like them is just plain daft. Dont bother uploading them in the first place if that is the case.

[RingwaySam]

It's always good to look back and see have you've improved imho.

[brianw999]

which would boost my average views which i would like deleted as well.

What is it with peoples obsession with average view numbers, number of pics in database etc. ?

For goodness sake, it's not a competition.

[phtr88]

If you don't like them, why even bother uploading?

The first two shots were taken in 2004 when I was unexperienced and uploaded each rubbish I took.....

Would be nice if someone could manage it....

Philipp

[DAL767-400ER]

If you don't like them, why even bother uploading?

[LX-A343]

There goes the time of some screeners ....

Gerardo

[Paul Maier]

yeah while your at it, ive got more than a few in my first 100 shots which i dont like, which are of negligable quality and subject matter, which would boost my average views which i would like deleted as well.