Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you agree?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kukkudrill
    replied
    To me the sharpening looks a bit overdone too.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Check the building ... didn't know, AMS was that close to Pisa

    And I also agree on the potential "dark" rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • McG
    replied
    Hi Joop,

    I agree with the reasons, the white paint line running alongside the runway has a slight slope to it. A touch of CCW rotation will fix this. The aircraft has a lot of dead space below it - however I understand that your motive for this is to include the 744F in the background. If you re-crop it with out the grass and a small portion of the runway it will look more balanced and still include the 744F.

    HTH

    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Joop
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Hi joop,
    A little ccw rotation is needed. If you are looking at the pole isn't "as vertical as it can be".
    About the center issue it 's all about balance. Too much sky here makes the picture unbalanced.
    And finally I would say that this picture could also have been rejected for dark as the plane is too dark...

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • Joop
    started a topic Do you agree?

    Do you agree?

    Hi all,

    this shot http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1309263 got rejected because a/c is not centered and horizon unlevel.
    In both cases I don't agree as the pole is as vertical as can be and the tarmac is as horizontal as can be.
    Regarding the a/c not centered I don't see the issue either.

    May have your opinion please?

    thanks in advance.
    Joop
Working...
X