Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quick Soft question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quick Soft question

    Hi , the image below has been rejected twice for "soft"

    any advice ?

    cheers all


  • #2
    "Quick soft question" -> here's a soft answer

    In my opinion, the nose until the "Seaworld" title - well, mainly this title - looks a bit soft. That said, the photo looks pretty acceptable on my screen. Nevertheless, I gave it a go in Photoshop, adding 250% / Rad 0.2 / TS 2. Have you appealed it? The result was a sharper photo but with jaggies on other parts -> not much better. So, either use some selective sharpening (good chances), start from scratch (I doubt, that it will get much better) or appeal it.

    Cheers
    Gerardo
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #3
      Gerardo .. thanks for the reply , i usually use 180-190% 0.2 as a rule ..

      generally if required have a go with selective sharpening , yup have used the appeal but just noticed the site forum thanks to Dan for pointing it out hadnt thought to check .... just a waiting game now .

      Like you say if any further sharpening is applied then it tends to blow everything else ... fingures crossed

      cheers

      best wishe Tony

      Comment

      Working...
      X