I can imagine the scene. Somebody looks at you and your hasselblad and you say .... "Size matters, didn't you know that?"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Impending Change to Photo Cropping Rules
Collapse
X
-
-
All of these photos rejected because of Cropping / Photo edges. I always keep my photos in 1024 X 768 ratio. Let see how is the appeal goes. Thanks.
Comment
-
new photo sizes
recently received the new cropping rules for pictures.....
there is a problem though - when I resize a file in Photoshop CS2 (Cameras Canon 300D and 30D) file image sizes 3072x2048 and 3504x2336
the size comes out as 1600x1067 or 1280x853 or 1024x683
and always has.... (been doing this for four years now)
BUT - this as you can see is NOT one of the new sizes
and since I dont do any other 'cropping/resizing' to my files this new size you stipulate will involve considerable effort on my part as the 1280x960 size is NOT what I get when resizing my files........
Perhaps you could rethink this new 'standard' as it conflicts with the way my software resizes the pictures............
Bob Leask (musice)
Comment
-
Hi Bob,
there is no need to rethink the new rule. It says:Photos should be uploaded between 4:3 or 3:2 format.
Your examples above are all acceptable:
1600x1067 or 1280x853 or 1024x683 are all a 3:2 size ratio
Now, your photos rejected for "cropping" had 1280x842 (2x) and 1280x837 (1x), which is slightly below 1280x853
Hope, this clears it up.
Comment
-
Oh golly, another step down the road to mindless photography.
Have you looked at how much space is wasted at the top and bottom of a picture?
Allowing letterbox formats would get the best use out of a picture, cutting down on needless grass, tarmac, concrete or sky.Wallace
Comment
-
I fail to see the "mindless photography" in the change, but IMO the most mindless photography is to simply cut off a photo around the main subject.
I guess, you simply cut off parts of a slide away before a slide show
Gerardo
Comment
-
I just posted a link to the thousands of B717 shots just to give you an idea.
Just add some space above and below the aircraft. I don't see, how this makes the B717/Md80 or F100 for that matter any fatter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by United_Fanmakes them look too fat.
here's a tip for you all: divide the picture size(1024 x 683 for example) and compare it to 4 divided by 3, and 3 divided by 2 and if it is close then it will most likely be ok.
-Chris
Comment
-
Originally posted by LX-A343I guess, you simply cut off parts of a slide away before a slide show Gerardo
I am not a great fan of an open slather on aspect ratios, many use that "creativity" to save a poorly shot image but I do believe 16:9 should be allowed.
Cheers
Chris
Comment
Comment