If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks Mike. For this rejection I did not receive an e-mail with a link for appealing. So, how can I appeal? Should I only upload again the photo?
And another question: Why some rejections are announced and others not? Is there some criteria?
OK, many questions, not that many answers, but here we go.
Originally posted by marcao
Stairs are no longer acepted in the pictures?
Planes being serviced are no longer acepted?
It all depends on how the overall pic looks like, what the pic is telling the screener. And here we are in a big grey area with no easy to set standards. Some screeners might accept such a pic, others not. I wouldn't have accepted it as well. It's not only the foreground clutter, which of course can be discussed, but also the overall quality of the pic. It seems overexposed and not level. Too many minus points to end up in an accepted picture.
That said, I would accept - and in fact have already - pictures with "airport scenery", but they have to "appeal me". If you don't agree with the rejection, appeal.
Originally posted by Greg
I'm confused also.
I can't see your pics anymore, so I can't judge your pics. The accepted pic you showed seems far better to me, that Marco's rejected one. We can discuss about the subject shown in the picture, but one thing is sure: it's level and better exposed.
Originally posted by marcao
And another question: Why some rejections are announced and others not? Is there some criteria?
What do you mean by that? With every rejection, a rejection cause is added (like "blurry", "bad angle", "horizon unlevel", ....). Then, the screener can insert a personal comment, if he wants. Of course, if the screener selects "bad quality" and doesn't add a comment, then it's difficult to say, what exactly let the screener take this decision. But then again, in most cases, it should be clear just by looking at the picture . If not, come here and ask.
Originally posted by JeffinDEN
I'd call it E V O L U T I O N
It is a welcome phenomenon.
Thanks, ..... in case you mean the website . If not, then I misunderstood. :P
I can't see your pics anymore, so I can't judge your pics. The accepted pic you showed seems far better to me, that Marco's rejected one. We can discuss about the subject shown in the picture, but one thing is sure: it's level and better exposed.
I'm no longer confused. Mike has helped and I understand more fully the problem with the pics.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
. If not, come here and ask.
Comment