Part of aircraft cut off

[Paul Stam]

Good afternoon,

This one was rejected for: part of aircraft cut off.





But I see aften photos of aircraft incomplete which are accepted, for instance this one:

B-KAF of Pawel Fronczak at March 08 2008.

Why is this one accepted?

What are the rules?

[degi]

We discussed it in a thread yesterday.

This one doesn't look croped properly. I'd crop it more closer, because here you've got a half engine, a third of the tail and this looks just cut off. I'd cut it right behind the cargo titles or even behind the Dragonair titles and it'll be look much better.

[CPH Aviation]

This is basiclly a B747 were you cut off the tail, its not a closeup or anything like that. The angle of the aircraft makes it hard to crop without getting a cut off rejection! YTou could try a crop between the Dragonair and Cargo titles, that might work.

Soren

[degi]

Paul, try it just like that example:

[Eadster]

The crop above would work, however to me its much more appealing to have the whole aircraft included, especially from that angle and location you have there.

[Paul Stam]

It was my intention to take a photo of the whole plane, but it came very fast to me, so I had no the time to change my lense. And the location I was is now forbidden, so I had to make the photo very fast.

Many thanks for your advices.

Greetings,

Paul