If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
and btw congrats for your work that has reduced by 50% the Q in a few days.
Thank you very much! I just checked the screening stats of the past few days. While the team effort was again fantastic, there were again a few outstanding contributions from some team members. I don't want to show the names here for obvious reasons, but to those in the crew (you know, who I mean ... hopefully): THANKS VERY MUCH!!!!
While the pic is in screening it is listed as rejection, just to get the calculation for the up-load limit correct. [...] but for the basic membership it would open an option to up-load more then you are allowed, if it would be different.
This answers to a question that I ask to myself for so long... thank you!
and btw congrats for your work that has reduced by 50% the Q in a few days.
as a new screener I can say if people took the time to just look and removed dust spots they would see such a higher acceptance rate. after cropping that's the first thing I look for on my own shots.
Nope, our photos are in the same queue as any other photo. No preferential treatment here. The payment we get for working here for free can be seen here:
I was wondering how does it work for the photos taken by screeners... do they have to pass through the queue system just like the rest of us or do you have some sort of preferential treatment for helping and contributing so much to the site's operation?
While the pic is in screening it is listed as rejection, just to get the calculation for the up-load limit correct. It does have no impact for you, as you are an "Elite" member, but for the basic membership it would open an option to up-load more then you are allowed, if it would be different.
While the pic is in screening it is listed as rejection, just to get the calculation for the up-load limit correct. It does have no impact for you, as you are an "Elite" member, but for the basic membership it would open an option to up-load more then you are allowed, if it would be different.
I hope this question fits here if not, I will put it in a new thread.
I was waiting for a result of a photo that was being screened after 3 others were accepted, and at one point the "Period Total" box said that I had 1 rejection after the first 3 was accepted. I then got an email confirming the 3 acceptations and it also said that the other shot had been screened by one screener. The image wasn't in the "Rejected Photos" page either. Awhile later the shot was accepted and the rejection box showed 0. My question is: will the rejections box show 1 being rejected if one screener has already chosen to reject it even though it isn't out of screening yet?
I hope that makes sense, that may be the long way of asking it but I haven't had much sleep
After seeing that screenshot of the software used , i am thoroughly impressed ! Way to go all you software creators, screeners and the gang who makes this site happen.
I doff my hat to all you guys individually and collectively .
If a picture is really nice, which means the screener has to just sit back for a moment and thinks something like "omg THAT is soo nice", we can check a screener's choice box, it is at the lower left in the image I posted. To be sure it is a really nice picture, we normally put it in vote for a second screener. So both screeners have to be enthusiastic about it
cheers, Pamela
Indeed thanks for all the behind the scenes info on screening at jetphotos.net. I fully agree with Brian in that the screening is fast. Just last week my photos were in the queue at number 400 and all photos got screened two days later, amazing and a job well done!
Regarding Screener's Choice photos, I put a comment in the "comment to screeners" box when uploading these two photos that have been accepted:
I hoped these photos or one of these photos would make a screener's choice photo but apparently they didn't. I just love the rain effect on the aircraft and runway. Night photos are also very nice to take.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: