Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Constructive Critisism Required!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shaggy
    replied
    Thanks for the all the help and advice guys. My sots are coming out much better my editing has also improved.

    Just been diagnosed with Bells Palsy this week, so the editing is a little difficult with one side of my face paralyzed. Doh

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    I run my sharpening at 50%, 0.3 and pass over 2 or 3 times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggy
    replied
    Cheers Bri

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Then again it would be a boring world if we agreed on everything!
    Wouldn't it just.....

    ......which is why I always start with 50_0.2_0

    I find the sharpening easier to manage in small steps and especially so when some parts go on to require some selective sharpening.

    BTW, the two Emirates 380 shots will get a similar rejection whichever gets to be the second one screened. I'm at work tonight but with a bit of luck I'll get a chance to take a closer look tomorrow, provided the world and his wife don't get to need an ambulance tonight.
    Last edited by brianw999; 2009-01-02, 22:23.

    Leave a comment:


  • arjenp
    replied
    Originally posted by PMN View Post

    Then again it would be a boring world if we agreed on everything!

    Paul
    That's right, and we should keep that.
    It's just in the advantage of the photograver.

    Shaggy, if you need more opinions, we are always ready to give it.

    Leave a comment:


  • PMN
    replied
    Originally posted by arjenp View Post
    Is also an option, I don't care about how to do it, it works for me.
    I don't doubt that. I still think 0.4's a bit big for a 1024 wide image though.

    Then again it would be a boring world if we agreed on everything!

    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • arjenp
    replied
    Originally posted by PMN View Post
    I'd say 0.4 is a little on the large side for an image 1024 wide. Try 90-100% at 0.3 instead. That should work quite nicely.

    Paul
    Is also an option, I don't care about how to do it, it works for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggy
    replied
    Thanks again guys

    Leave a comment:


  • PMN
    replied
    Originally posted by arjenp View Post
    Most people recommend 50 or 100 % 0.4 threshold and than do it a few times
    I'd say 0.4 is a little on the large side for an image 1024 wide. Try 90-100% at 0.3 instead. That should work quite nicely.

    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • arjenp
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
    Thanks for comments so far, sharpening i use Unsharp Mask 500%, 0.2 threshold i give it one pass then lower the amount if necessary. Never been any good at sharpening
    Most people recommend 50 or 100 % 0.4 threshold and than do it a few times

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggy
    replied
    Thanks for comments so far, sharpening i use Unsharp Mask 500%, 0.2 threshold i give it one pass then lower the amount if necessary. Never been any good at sharpening

    Leave a comment:


  • PMN
    replied
    There are too many to go through individually but generally they're good and don't really need much work at all. Just two main things I notice. Firstly, you have a tendancy to place the aircraft a little too low in the frame. Generally the fuselage should sit nice and central in the frame vertically, which it doesn't in a few of these. Maybe try cropping using a 3:2 aspect ratio. That will mean the frame won't be as high and it might be easier getting it central.

    Secondly, these all appear slightly oversharpened. What technique are you using to sharpen?

    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • arjenp
    replied
    On my screen it looks like the Air Canada and the Iberia has a small halo around it's rightwing.
    The histogram of the Virgin A340 shows that it's dark. The BA 747 also.
    But there great shots

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggy
    started a topic Constructive Critisism Required!!!

    Constructive Critisism Required!!!

    Right guys. Good weather at EGLL today. After getting some adive of off you in another thread I thought I would use today to have a practice.

    Below are my submisisons so far. [email protected] them off as neccersary, I know they wont be much cop, but if you could point me in the right direction, I would very much appreciate it.

    Thanks.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286371
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286373
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286375
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286376
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286378
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286380
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286382
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286387
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286389
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286392
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286393
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286399
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2286401
Working...
X