If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Paul I left you a message in one of your latest rejection. Here's what you'll find in the upload guideline :
6.2 Compression
Save your images at a high JPG quality or low compression settings. Saving at low quality settings or using a high compression rate is great for saving disk space but it means you are losing large amounts of quality from the image, areas which are the first to show signs of over-compression are where colors border each other in particular the registration and cockpit areas.
This is your comment: Screener's Comments: still the very same compression problem Paul. Please remember to always save your pics at the highest qulity possible. This'll avoid the compression - Regards
The rejected photo OK-CGK of CSA, I posted is only 106kb.
I use a noisefilter and when I have used that the photos are only between 100kb and 150 kb.
Not using the noisefilter my photo of OK-CGK is saved with 641KB,. Is that the reason of artefacts?
Look at the photos
The first one is with noisefilter, tehe second without noisefilter.
The rejected photo OK-CGK of CSA, I posted is only 106kb.
I use a noisefilter and when I have used that the photos are only between 100kb and 150 kb.
Not using the noisefilter my photo of OK-CGK is saved with 641KB,. Is that the reason of artefacts?
Look at the photos
The first one is with noisefilter, tehe second without noisefilter.
Kindly regards,
Paul Stam
So I guess your noise filter programm is fully responsible there... there's no reason your pics are at 100kb. all my pics are between 800kb and 1mo.
I first crop and resize, then proceed further in the processing process. I never have compression artefacts.
I had them when I first processed and afterwards cropped/resized and saved. (I never work with RAW, always JPG). Especially when you sharpen FIRST and then resize/crop/save then you can have artefacts.
When you look closely, you see that there is something not correct with or by the registration number. This is the place where jpg-artefacts mostly occur. I must admit, in your case you have to look closely, but I see it. And apparently did the screeners.
Why resize in two steps? I always crop first (after horizon levelling), then resize. In one step: from big to 1024. No steps in between needed.
I have had pics rejected, but not due to artefacts. But I know that there are some who, just like you, resize in two or even more steps, but I haven't yet seen the benefit of that.
Well I have to buy new eyes or a new PC, because I see no artefacts with or by the registration number, even when I use the equalize tool I see nothing.
I resize in two steps because that was once recommended to me in this forum by Seahawk.
In it's own workflow he says nothing about it. The only thing what you can do is I think to do it in one step.
I have to say that I also see not much on your photo. I see that on a lot of reg/photo's, but there must be a difference
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment