Nice as this kind of photos may be, for me they are purely artistic and have little or nothing to do with aviation.
This doesnīt mean I respect the photographers who make these shots because I canīt make them. I think one must have lots of patience to get a shot like this done
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Help me...
Collapse
X
-
Martin is right here: the accepted photo should have been rejected for wrong infos, as it should have been uploaded as airport overview. I'll send in the corrections for you.
The second one is too similar to the other. I wouldn't upload it anymore.
Gerardo
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Eadster View PostIf its this one you mean: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2295933
The reason is because the aircraft details are filled in, but as its more of an overview shot, then the overview details should be included. Alex (or another screener) may be able to correct me but I believe the overview details should have been included on the accepted one...
Another point to be careful of, and once again if that is the shot you mean, then watch for similars.
Leave a comment:
-
If its this one you mean: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2295933
The reason is because the aircraft details are filled in, but as its more of an overview shot, then the overview details should be included. Alex (or another screener) may be able to correct me but I believe the overview details should have been included on the accepted one...
Another point to be careful of, and once again if that is the shot you mean, then watch for similars.
Leave a comment:
-
The 2nd link provided is the exact same than the 1st one...
Leave a comment:
-
Help me...
Hi,
I got some night photos .
Accepted : http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6455302
But this one was rejected : http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6455302
I didn't know why but I selected the "Auto-fill" mode to add the info of Airlines, Airport, Aircraft...and 2 photos are the same angle .
Please explain for me . Thanks a lotTags: None
Leave a comment: