Different screeners, different opinions, still confusing

[MatthewLima]

Thanks Pamela (and others), this explains everything

[pdeboer]

All rejection reasons are valid. What generally happens is that obvious mistakes are instantly rejected, not much time is spent on checking other details. This is what we do with bad info, but also for dust spots, or when the color/contrast/sharpness/horizon/etc is way off. You can image that with a queue of 10K we want to make some progress. So a kind request to (re)check the upload guideline carefully before uploading to help us screening and prevent yourself from instant rejects on obvious errors

cheers, Pamela

[brianw999]

If you don't know the reg then leave it blank. Same goes for the c/n.

[tommyalf]

Both rejections really do apply in this case. In general if we see bad info we generally automatically reject the shot.

[MatthewLima]

Hi,

Last week I uploaded this picture:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2515894

and it got rejected as I apparently filled out one field wrong. So I tried again, and guess what happened?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2526725

Of course, different screeners, different opinions, but still this was really surprising and confusing me.

What do you think?

BTW: it's the exact same version of the picture in both cases