Not in focus?

[Joop]

Hello all,

I would like to have your feedback on the following:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2557002

This photo was originally rejected for being blurry. I appealed because i think the Fokker is reasonable sharp. When you compare it with the Airbus on the frontpage: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6594648 I don't see much difference so I appealed.
The appeal was rejected because my pic 'is not in focus and the Airbus is'.
Can someone explain me the difference between the two pics (except the aircraft type and the location )

Thanks in advande for your feedback,
Joop

[kukkudrill]

Both look blurred to me, but it's more obvious in your photo. Guess it's a question of where you draw the line.

[LX-A343]

Check the titles in your photo: clearly blurry. The one in the db doesn't seem blurry to me.

[Joop]

Check the titles in your photo: clearly blurry. The one in the db doesn't seem blurry to me.

Thanks for your feedback but what is the difference then between clearly and blurry.
With all respect to the photographer of the Airbus I am about to say mine is sharper. But maybe I should see the eyedoctor .

[LX-A343]

Compare the "Cityhopper" and the "swiss" titles. If you still say, yours is sharper, then perhaps a visit to the eydoctor wouldn't be the worst idea.

[boeingfreak]

Thanks for your feedback but what is the difference then between clearly and blurry.
With all respect to the photographer of the Airbus I am about to say mine is sharper. But maybe I should see the eyedoctor .

Your's clearly is blurry, just look at the main gear tires or the cityhopper titles. It's quite noisy as well as you obviously tried to compensate blurryness with a serious amount of sharpening.