Dark/underexposed

[twr75]

I'm curious about your comment on this photo:

...after the sun went down...

If that is true, what's that round yellow light source reflecting off the fuselage below the Skyteam logo?

[seahawk]

And the colour is very strange. Looks a little greenish on my screen and not like some warm sunrise / sundown colours.

[Joop]

Hi Brian,

thanks for the feedback.
Currently on holiday but when I am back I'll try to solve it.

Joop

[brianw999]

Dear all,

Can anyone give me a more detailed explanation why this nightshot is too dark?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2573484

It got rejecected so I appealed. It got rejected again because it's supposed to be not level which I doubt.

There are loads of nightshots which are way darker then this one and what I don't like/understand either why there is now all of a sudden a second reason to reject this photo. Why can't it be said at the first time. I sed the grid function so I am 99.99% sure this is level.

Thanks in advance for your constructive feedback,
Joop

For the horizon it could use a tweak of CW rotation although I seem to recall that that taxiway slopes up from left to right a bit ?

Dark/under ? ...... One look at the histogram tells all. All of the graph is in the centre to the left with virtually no light tones at all on the right. Bring the right hand baseline arrow across to the right side base of the graph and you'll get this....Oh, there's also a bit of grain to deal with as well.....

[Joop]

Dear all,

Can anyone give me a more detailed explanation why this nightshot is too dark?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2573484

It got rejecected so I appealed. It got rejected again because it's supposed to be not level which I doubt.

There are loads of nightshots which are way darker then this one and what I don't like/understand either why there is now all of a sudden a second reason to reject this photo. Why can't it be said at the first time. I sed the grid function so I am 99.99% sure this is level.

Thanks in advance for your constructive feedback,
Joop