Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Part of aircraft cut off

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Part of aircraft cut off

    Hello,

    can someone explain me the difference between why
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6636459 this one gets accepted

    and http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2639336 this one gets rejected

    Thanks in advance for your feedback,
    Joop

  • #2
    rejected one : left wing cutoff which was unecessary to balance the pic.
    accepted pic : left wing is there, balanced shot

    Regards
    Alex

    Comment


    • #3
      Also Joop in addition to what Omar stated IMO the left wing in the reject shot blocks the lower fusalage and front nose gear is out of view leading further to the inbalance.

      Comment


      • #4
        ...and on the rejected one Joop, I would have added soft to the rejection.
        If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

        Comment


        • #5
          Surprisingly,They both a a greenish colour cast...the whites are not pure.
          The sky quality isn't great also but these things are fixable but unfortunately the cut-off part isn't.
          Did you sharpen the whole image?
          This is what I could come up with..I think it looks better,
          Corrected on the left.




          Regards,

          Conor

          Comment


          • #6
            Hello all,

            thanks for your feedback so far. Highly appreciated.
            To be honest, i dont understand the 'unbalance' part some of you are talking about so if someone could explain that to me would be great.

            Furthermore, the cut off discussion, for me personally, becomes an issue when the aircraft type is not recognizable as such anymore.
            I believe rejection on part cut off is a very subjective reason fo rejection.
            Saying this, there are more which can be very subjective as well but that's another discussion. Maybe something for a new thread...

            Cheers,
            Joop

            Comment

            Working...
            X