Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by brianw999 View Post
    The Nam is soft, a little dark and low on contrast and the citilink is low on contrast.
    just edited the contrast on this one
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0687e2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	442.5 KB
ID:	1015404

    how about this new pict?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1152.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	748.1 KB
ID:	1015405

    Thanks Sir.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ronaldsim84 View Post
      just edited the contrast on this one
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]7202[/ATTACH]

      how about this new pict?
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]7203[/ATTACH]

      Thanks Sir.
      Hi,
      And welcome to our forum, you took the right step !!


      1st one still lacks contrast - with the amount of light on the fuselage, not sure it could be most improved.

      2nd, sorry, but is totally destroyed by editing (something like shadow/highlight was used) - Remember planes should be white. Also see how foreground is pixelized


      Regards
      Alex
      Last edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 2017-02-15, 14:27.

      Comment


      • Hello

        Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3695.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	913.6 KB
ID:	1015407
        Regards,
        Kelvin Jahae

        Comment


        • Originally posted by MSTspotter View Post
          Hello

          Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]7205[/ATTACH]
          Image looks OK to me. The type will need to be added to the database using the link on the upload page. For more info (c/n, type etc) go to www.scramble.nl and search the Norwegian Air Force using the Reg. Scramble is considered to be the bible of all things military.
          If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

          Comment


          • Originally posted by MSTspotter View Post
            Hello

            Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]7205[/ATTACH]
            https://www.jetphotos.com/showphotos...t+Falcon+20ECM
            “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

            Erwin

            Comment


            • Yes its in the DB, but I cant find it in the list of Falcon 20.. Only E or E-5

              Edit: The 041 is already in DB, but it doesnt show up when I enter the registration
              Regards,
              Kelvin Jahae

              Comment


              • Originally posted by brianw999 View Post
                Image looks OK to me. The type will need to be added to the database using the link on the upload page. For more info (c/n, type etc) go to www.scramble.nl and search the Norwegian Air Force using the Reg. Scramble is considered to be the bible of all things military.
                Thanks Brian!
                Regards,
                Kelvin Jahae

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MSTspotter View Post
                  Yes its in the DB, but I cant find it in the list of Falcon 20.. Only E or E-5

                  Edit: The 041 is already in DB, but it doesnt show up when I enter the registration
                  It is in the list.

                  Brgds
                  “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

                  Erwin

                  Comment


                  • My bad, the new upload page seems to load in a progressive way where you need to start each field with the first few letters. If the aircraft is in the database it will load.
                    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ErwinS View Post
                      It is in the list.

                      Brgds
                      Thanks Im now seeing the Dassault in the list under de 041

                      Regards
                      Regards,
                      Kelvin Jahae

                      Comment


                      • Hello! This photos were rejected, are they ok now?

                        1. Rejected due to Overexposed and Too much or too little contrast:

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1082psax1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	939.4 KB
ID:	1015410

                        2. Rejected due to Overexposed, Dark / Underexposed, Too much or too little contrast

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0220psax1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	675.3 KB
ID:	1015411

                        3. Rejected due to Oversharpen, JPG compression artefacts

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3703psax1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	804.2 KB
ID:	1015412

                        4. Rejected due to harsh contrast and some weird fuzzy lines on some edges

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6130psax1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	822.7 KB
ID:	1015413

                        5. Is this one ok?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6616psx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,007.7 KB
ID:	1015418

                        Thanks for any help/suggestions

                        Comment


                        • What do you think?

                          What do you guys think?thanks Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4412.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	62.8 KB
ID:	1015421

                          Comment


                          • 1.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0748.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	519.9 KB
ID:	1015422
                            2.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1568-1280px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	768.8 KB
ID:	1015423
                            3.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1842-1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	418.1 KB
ID:	1015424
                            4.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1851-1280px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	745.3 KB
ID:	1015425
                            5.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2059-1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	529.0 KB
ID:	1015426
                            is it good ?
                            (nb: all watermark will be delete)

                            Comment


                            • Hey JP crew!
                              Can I get some prescreening?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GKXJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	314.0 KB
ID:	1015427

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	HA-LXN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	270.1 KB
ID:	1015428

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZBG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	324.6 KB
ID:	1015429

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	HA-LWR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	230.9 KB
ID:	1015430

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EMP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	272.9 KB
ID:	1015431

                              Thanks, Aron

                              Comment


                              • hello, is this ok?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	G-DBCD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	734.0 KB
ID:	1015433

                                thanks
                                My JetPhotos Profile

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X