Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello dlowwa, do you think this one is better in terms of contrast and color? thanks

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]6950[/ATTACH]
    Still very borderline imho. Contrast is weak and there remains a slight blue/cyan cast. Given the overall light, I'm not sure you can make it better with more editing.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by oc_aviation_ View Post
      Hi, thanks for the help! I attatched the link below for the DL 757. While I was fixing the crop ratio, I fixed a few of the other things that you recommended I fix. I think I fixed the ratio, but I'm not sure. Is there anything I should fix?
      Thanks,
      -Braeden
      Ratio is acceptable now, and the color is better.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Still very borderline imho. Contrast is weak and there remains a slight blue/cyan cast. Given the overall light, I'm not sure you can make it better with more editing.
        I'm trying my best with bad weather conditions but unfortunately this is the typical weather in Azores many times in the year lol Nature needs water Thanks, one for my personal collection.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Ratio is acceptable now, and the color is better.
          Ok thanks! I'm working on the other photos.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            Ratio is acceptable now, and the color is better.
            Hi,
            I fixed these photos.... I think haha
            Here's the links below to the AA 737 and SW 737. Let me know what you think about them and if there's anything that I can fix.
            Thanks,
            -Braeden

            http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=5608352

            http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=5608372

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by meneses24
              First one: Great

              Second one: Bit soft and leaning a bit to the left, needs CW.

              Third one: Bit dark but good.

              4th and 5th: Tad soft, a little bit more would be perfect

              All accepted, thanks for the tips!

              Comment


              • #22
                Hi everyone.

                Is this ok?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	7T-VKG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.6 KB
ID:	1015232
                My JetPhotos Profile

                Comment


                • #23
                  Hello again! Are these ok? Thanks for the help!!!

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4654psx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	692.2 KB
ID:	1015233

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7856OO-JAOpsx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	496.2 KB
ID:	1015234

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8066psx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	915.1 KB
ID:	1015235

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8131psx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	929.6 KB
ID:	1015236

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by oc_aviation_ View Post
                    Hi,
                    I fixed these photos.... I think haha
                    Here's the links below to the AA 737 and SW 737. Let me know what you think about them and if there's anything that I can fix.
                    Thanks,
                    -Braeden
                    Ratio is ok for both; contrast might be an issue, but it's not terrible.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by fabinho1314 View Post
                      Hi everyone.

                      Is this ok?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]6951[/ATTACH]
                      A little oversharpened, but might be ok.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
                        Hello again! Are these ok? Thanks for the help!!!

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]6952[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]6953[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]6954[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]6955[/ATTACH]
                        First is backlit, so might have issues; second contrast is a bit strong/dark, but should be ok; last two suffer a bit from heat haze/oversharpening.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          First is backlit, so might have issues; second contrast is a bit strong/dark, but should be ok; last two suffer a bit from heat haze/oversharpening.
                          Hello dlowwa, about the last two was problably oversharpening. How about now? Thanks!

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8066psexposurex1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	843.8 KB
ID:	1015237

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8131psx1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	891.4 KB
ID:	1015238

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
                            Hello dlowwa, about the last two was problably oversharpening. How about now? Thanks!

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]6956[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]6957[/ATTACH]
                            Both suffer from heat haze, I am afraid you can not fix that

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Hello I've got a rejection: Too much contrast, soft and parts cut off, ive reduced shadows etc (pic isnt soft IMO), but I like the angle of the shot tho, is it acceptable?

                              Here's the rejection http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5604870

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1937.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	714.4 KB
ID:	1015239
                              Regards,
                              Kelvin Jahae

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by MSTspotter View Post
                                Hello I've got a rejection: Too much contrast, soft and parts cut off, ive reduced shadows etc (pic isnt soft IMO), but I like the angle of the shot tho, is it acceptable?

                                Here's the rejection http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5604870

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]6958[/ATTACH]
                                The horizontal tail stab is somewhat awkwardly cut off and there is plenty of dead space on the left side of the photo: try to make a tighter crop (for instance left edge next to the engine between the two flaps)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X