Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by huytrando View Post
    What do you guys think about these? Thanks in advance.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8198[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8199[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8200[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8201[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8202[/ATTACH]
    With exception of the first, color and contrast are definite issues to be concerned about. Contrast on the second, and color on third (cyan) and fourth/fifth (yellow/green cast).

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello, is this photo acceptable on JPnet?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8206[/ATTACH]
    Blurry, compressed, oversharpened, and backlit - sorry, this would be rejected I'm afraid.

    Comment


    • Hello,
      Is the Photo ok to upload?
      Thank you.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	3-XN.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	676.2 KB
ID:	1016235

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Ellx View Post
        Hello,
        Is the Photo ok to upload?
        Thank you.

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8207[/ATTACH]
        Noisy, and tail is blurry. Sorry, it would be rejected.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
          Hello, are any of these ok for upload? Contrast ok? Thanks

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8180[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8181[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8188[/ATTACH]
          Any help on these ones please

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
            Hello.
            This one was rejected due to Dark / Underexposed , Too much or too little contrast and a bit soft. Is it ok now?

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]8187[/ATTACH]
            Is it better? Thanks!

            Comment


            • Hello,
              Is the Photo ok to upload?
              Thank you.
              Please disregard the brown Mirage 2000 as I recieved already answer for it.
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                Any help on these ones please
                I see some issues with oversharpening/compression. Not sure exactly which one it is, but lots of jaggies visible, especially on the first and third.

                Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                Is it better? Thanks!
                Borderline. The light is not that great, so I could still see contrast/exposure being an issue.

                Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                Hello,
                Is the Photo ok to upload?
                Thank you.
                Please disregard the brown Mirage 2000 as I recieved already answer for it.
                Looks a bit soft & noisy, but not as bad as the first one.

                Comment


                • Just curious, I have this picture of an Adams A500 taken in 2005, it's a pretty rare aircraft with I believe only 7 built and apparently none left flying, the quality of the picture isn't that great though. Should I upload it?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	AP N501AX 001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	688.3 KB
ID:	1016238

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    I see some issues with oversharpening/compression. Not sure exactly which one it is, but lots of jaggies visible, especially on the first and third.



                    Borderline. The light is not that great, so I could still see contrast/exposure being an issue.



                    Looks a bit soft & noisy, but not as bad as the first one.
                    Hello Dlowwa, do you think this one is better now? This aircraft has a new paint scheme, is it considered "hot photo"? Thanks again

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0363ps1x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	660.2 KB
ID:	1016240

                    Comment


                    • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8207.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	881.6 KB
ID:	1016241

                      What do you think about this one?
                      And wich category should i use? Business?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by 71sbeetle View Post
                        Just curious, I have this picture of an Adams A500 taken in 2005, it's a pretty rare aircraft with I believe only 7 built and apparently none left flying, the quality of the picture isn't that great though. Should I upload it?

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8210[/ATTACH]
                        A bit bright/contrasty, but given it's a new reg., with some minor adjustments it should be fine.

                        Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                        Hello Dlowwa, do you think this one is better now? This aircraft has a new paint scheme, is it considered "hot photo"? Thanks again

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8214[/ATTACH]
                        Better than previous, but still see a few jaggies, especially around the reg. & cockpit. Yes, updated schemes count as hot.

                        Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8215[/ATTACH]

                        What do you think about this one?
                        And wich category should i use? Business?
                        Contrast is quite low. No special category applies.

                        Comment


                        • Hello,
                          Here are 4 Pictures of the same aircraft could you tell me what is the best in your opinion, and if one of those is ok for upload.
                          Plase consider also the bad weather.
                          Thank you.
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	311 Tornado LR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	613.1 KB
ID:	1016242Click image for larger version

Name:	311Tornado PS size before sharp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	710.1 KB
ID:	1016243Click image for larger version

Name:	311Tornado PS size before sharp reduce noise.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	682.4 KB
ID:	1016244Click image for larger version

Name:	311Tornado-PS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	415.2 KB
ID:	1016245

                          Comment


                          • Hello,

                            I want to ask for pre-screening of photos attached below.

                            Thank you.
                            Marian

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	G-MOCL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	566.3 KB
ID:	1016246
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	SX-DGM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	627.1 KB
ID:	1016247

                            Comment


                            • Hey,

                              i´m wondering if this one is acceptable:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	n850gt.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.72 MB
ID:	1016248
                              Probably Reject due to Obstructing Objects?
                              Thank you very much in advance, have a nice day!
                              Best Regards from Germany,
                              Julian S.​

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                A bit bright/contrasty, but given it's a new reg., with some minor adjustments it should be fine.
                                Thank you! The original was very dark maybe I overdid it in the processing lol

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X