Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This one has a slim chance, but what improvements, if any, are needed for this image? Thank you very much in advance!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HAVI_EGPF_2281.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	457.8 KB
ID:	1016865

    Or, if this one is any better...thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HAVI_EGPF_2278.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	446.9 KB
ID:	1016866
    Last edited by KyleMcKinlay; 2017-09-11, 20:15. Reason: Adding photos

    Comment


    • Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
      This one has a slim chance, but what improvements, if any, are needed for this image? Thank you very much in advance!

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8900[/ATTACH]

      Or, if this one is any better...thanks!

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8901[/ATTACH]
      Kyle,

      I think the shot has too much noise, low contrast and need more sharpening. When you take the shot, what settings did you use? It's appears to have a high ISO.

      Comment


      • The reason that I doubted my chances were because it was taken at 600mm, and a very large crop. The ISO was actually pretty low, either 400/500, the noise levels are just due to the large crop. Thanks.

        Comment


        • Hello,

          I'd like to have another try...

          The rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6073996

          Reworked version:

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3725.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	570.9 KB
ID:	1016867

          - Cropping reworked
          - Exposure increased by +1, whites reduced to minimize clippings at the nose

          Crossing fingers to meet the requirements now...
          Dominik
          Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/

          Comment


          • Hi, please pre-screen these takes. thank you.


            Click image for larger version

Name:	Private_N970SJ_16JAN17_1600_landing.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.35 MB
ID:	1016870

            Click image for larger version

Name:	private_N43EL_16JAN17_1600_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	982.6 KB
ID:	1016871

            Click image for larger version

Name:	AirFrance_F-GZNF_11FEB17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	451.4 KB
ID:	1016872

            Click image for larger version

Name:	KLM_PH-CKA_11FEB17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	955.9 KB
ID:	1016873

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Titan_N844AU_26JAN17_1200_profileLanding.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	526.0 KB
ID:	1016874

            Comment


            • Click image for larger version

Name:	CSC_0793.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	236.1 KB
ID:	1016876Click image for larger version

Name:	CSC_0788.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	341.2 KB
ID:	1016877Click image for larger version

Name:	CSC_0788.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	341.2 KB
ID:	1016877Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0075.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	651.5 KB
ID:	1016878

              Thanks in advance.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pawelm View Post
                Hi guys,

                What do you think about those? Yeah, I know weather was crap...

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8876[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8877[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8878[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8879[/ATTACH]

                thanks
                Guys?

                Comment


                • Del

                  Comment


                  • Pawel,
                    The MD needs ccw rotation and also lacks a bit contrast - the 2nd one is borderline contrast but could be acceptable as such. the 737 is obstructed and the ATR looks acceptable to me.

                    Regards
                    Alex

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
                      Hi, please pre-screen these takes. thank you.
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8906[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8907[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8908[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8909[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8910[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8911[/ATTACH]
                      Hello,
                      THE AF and KLM are backlit but the 3 others look acceptable to me.

                      Regards
                      Alex

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by zac787 View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8913[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8914[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8914[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8915[/ATTACH]

                        Thanks in advance.

                        Hi,
                        The 330s lack contact and are really too soft. I believe they can be adjustable to be accepted. The Dash is backlit.

                        Regards
                        Alex

                        Comment


                        • Thanks Alex,

                          And what about this one?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	LZ-LDN_02.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1016883

                          Edit: and one more. It was rejected for overexposure, is it acceptable now?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	4056.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	1016884

                          thanks

                          Comment


                          • Hi,

                            The following photos have beeen rejected.
                            I worked on the photos, are they ok now?
                            Thank you.

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6075678
                            reworked photo:
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	N798UA B-777 United.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	456.8 KB
ID:	1016881

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6075670
                            reworked photo
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AECF EMB190 Lufthansa.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	432.3 KB
ID:	1016882

                            the next photo was rejected because of horizon unlevel and contrast.
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6075672

                            My question about this photo, first if I increase the contrast level the colours will be unnatural?

                            Second: I oriented myself on the lightpole left side in the picture to level the horizon.
                            If I level the aircraft exactly horizontal, then the lightpole and also buildings in the background are unlevel.
                            Here is the photo with the aircraft in horizontal level.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIMB A-380 Lufthansa level.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1016885

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                              Hello,
                              THE AF and KLM are backlit but the 3 others look acceptable to me.

                              Regards
                              Alex
                              Thank you!

                              Comment


                              • JP Team, please check this set. Thank you as always for your time and feedback.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	Western_N543JN_ID1_26ABRIL17_1200Web_ProfUSETHIS.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	454.3 KB
ID:	1016888

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	British_G-YMMB_11FEB17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	979.8 KB
ID:	1016889

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	KLM_PH-CKA_11FEB17_1200_profile-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	662.5 KB
ID:	1016890

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	KLM_PH-CKA_11FEB17_1600_34sAC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,005.0 KB
ID:	1016891

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	Veca_N1235V_16JAN17_1200_midair.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	490.0 KB
ID:	1016892

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X