Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Thanks to the increasing participation in this thread (a good thing!), it is getting a little difficult to keep track of everyone's pre-screening requests. As a result, some of you may have noticed your requests being missed - unintentionally of course. Because of this, we have decided to change how we would like you to request prescreening/editing advice going forward. From this point on, please start your own thread, with your user name and "Editing Advice" in the title - it should look something like this: dlowwa - Editing Advice

    In your thread, you may ask for prescreening or postscreening, or any other general editing advice about your own images. Each time you have new images you would like to ask about, please use the same thread - do not start a new one. This will make it easier for us to see who has outstanding requests, but will also keep the forum clutter to a minimum.

    Also, replies will be open to all members, not only screeners. If you think you have something useful to contribute feel free, even if you are not crew!

    Hopefully this will lead to even more participation in the forum, as members can see that they can get helpful and constructive advice from others in the community.

    Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    [not the same numbers]

    dlowwa, thanks for the reply. See the new versions attached

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10615[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10616[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10617[/ATTACH]

    One more photo to pre-screen:

    4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10618[/ATTACH]

    And another question...I took this shot and stored in my personal collection. Do yout think this kind of photo worth a try to edit and upload to JP?

    5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10619[/ATTACH]

    Many thanks!
    1. ok
    2 - 3 borderline soft/contrast
    4. horizon (needs CW)
    5. dark, noisy

    Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hello JP crew... please check this set... thank you!

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10629[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10630[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10631[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10638[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast, color, horizon
    2. soft, contrast
    3. soft, backlit
    4. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you for the feedback on the previous lot! Are these acceptable? Some appear a little warm, although I don't remember having to adjust the white balance for sunset phots before...Thank you!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10632[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10633[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10634[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10635[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10636[/ATTACH]
    #4 a bit soft, no major issues on the others.

    Originally posted by jasonjayo View Post
    Would someone mind taking a look at these - Thank you.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10639[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10640[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10641[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline contrast/soft
    2. soft
    3. blurry
    4. too small. minimum size is 1024 pix

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by leocb24 View Post
    Hi JP team!
    Could you help me pre screening these photos!

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10643[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10644[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10645[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10646[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10647[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. borderline centering
    3. borderline overexposed
    4. backlit, overexposed
    5. oversharpened

    Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
    hi JP crew please prescreen
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10650[/ATTACH] 2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10651[/ATTACH] 3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10652[/ATTACH]4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10648[/ATTACH] 5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10649[/ATTACH]
    thanks a lot
    1. borderline contrast
    2. oversharpened, blurry
    3. ok
    4. contrast
    5. heat distortion

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ldavid350 View Post
    Hi JP Crew.. Could you look this pic and give me a review?
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10653[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10654[/ATTACH]

    The following photos had been published before, but I will publish again because I made the improvements indicated to the photographs.
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10657[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10655[/ATTACH]
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10656[/ATTACH]

    Thanks
    1. soft
    2. soft, contrast
    3. soft, contrast
    4. soft, contrast, overexposed
    5. soft, contrast

    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Thank You Gerardo!
    I have edited two other pictures and this is what i have now.
    1.1.2[ATTACH=CONFIG]10673[/ATTACH]
    2.1.2[ATTACH=CONFIG]10674[/ATTACH]
    What do you mean now?
    Thanks again and have a nice day
    1. ok
    2. heat haze too noticeable

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixo Silva View Post
    Hello, when possible can any JP screener pre-screen these. Thanks!
    1. soft. contrast
    2. heat haze
    3. ok
    4. contrast, heat haze
    5. contrast, soft

    Originally posted by jasonc7879 View Post
    hello, please pre-screen these two, thank you [ATTACH=CONFIG]10675[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]10676[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast, noise, borderline obstruction
    2. vignetting, borderline noise

    Leave a comment:


  • jasonc7879
    replied
    hello, please pre-screen these two, thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00180.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	860.7 KB
ID:	1019764Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00755.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	570.3 KB
ID:	1019765

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paixo Silva
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixo Silva View Post
    Hello!

    These two were rejected due to Undersharpened (Soft) (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6158501 and https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6158497) Are they ok now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10623[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10624[/ATTACH]

    Can you also give your opinion on these:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10625[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10627[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10628[/ATTACH]
    Hello, when possible can any JP screener pre-screen these. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1.1 unlevel, noisy and the chopped off tip of the stab is too distracting, either show all of it or crop closer to the tail
    1.2 OK
    2.1 same as 1.1. If you compare them side by side, the look both unlevel, just in the opposite directions.
    2.2 OK
    Thank You Gerardo!
    I have edited two other pictures and this is what i have now.
    1.1.2Click image for larger version

Name:	lxrcvIIII.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.63 MB
ID:	1019762
    2.1.2Click image for larger version

Name:	lxvclIIII.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.0 KB
ID:	1019763
    What do you mean now?
    Thanks again and have a nice day

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;654924]
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    Thanks for the advice. Gave the triple a some extra contrast
    It's included right now

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10664[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10665[/ATTACH]

    Also a second one , which gives me doubt especially about the sharpness.

    Many thanks again.
    1: much better
    2: too high in the frame

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Are these ok for upload?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10666[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10667[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10668[/ATTACH]
    1 lacks contrast, soft
    2 a bit (too) noisy
    3 OK

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey Crew!

    I have taken some Pictures today and id like to ask if they were acceptable.
    1.1[ATTACH=CONFIG]10669[/ATTACH]1.2[ATTACH=CONFIG]10670[/ATTACH]
    2.1[ATTACH=CONFIG]10671[/ATTACH]2.2[ATTACH=CONFIG]10672[/ATTACH] (do i need to tick "special scheme" due to the Joe Sutter sticker?)

    Thank you very very much in advance and have a beautyful day!
    1.1 unlevel, noisy and the chopped off tip of the stab is too distracting, either show all of it or crop closer to the tail
    1.2 OK
    2.1 same as 1.1. If you compare them side by side, the look both unlevel, just in the opposite directions.
    2.2 OK

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Hey Crew!

    I have taken some Pictures today and id like to ask if they were acceptable.
    1.1Click image for larger version

Name:	lxrcvII.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	647.0 KB
ID:	10197581.2Click image for larger version

Name:	lxrcvIII.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	1019759
    2.1Click image for larger version

Name:	lxvcl.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	570.4 KB
ID:	10197602.2Click image for larger version

Name:	lxvclII.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.44 MB
ID:	1019761 (do i need to tick "special scheme" due to the Joe Sutter sticker?)

    Thank you very very much in advance and have a beautyful day!

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Are these ok for upload?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0343.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	620.3 KB
ID:	1019755
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0270.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	477.2 KB
ID:	1019756
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0579.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	441.3 KB
ID:	1019757

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=LX-A343;654883]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Both OK in my opinion. Maybe you can add some more contrast on the second, it looks a bit flat to me.
    Thanks for the advice. Gave the triple a some extra contrast
    It's included right now

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9788.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1019753
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9749.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1,011.7 KB
ID:	1019754

    Also a second one , which gives me doubt especially about the sharpness.

    Many thanks again.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X