Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eduardo Paixão Silva
    replied
    These two were rejected due to vignetting:



    Are they ok now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9137ps2x1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	435.0 KB
ID:	1017162
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9145ps1x1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	459.9 KB
ID:	1017163

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paixão Silva
    replied
    Hello JP team.

    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6086929

    Can any screener explain to me whats wrong "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing" and what is the "Categories wrong or missing" because i don't see it.

    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6086937

    Is it ok now or it's something not fixable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1237ps4x1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	521.9 KB
ID:	1017161

    Leave a comment:


  • 777MAN
    replied
    Hi, appreciate feedback on the rejection pls

    Too much or too little contrast - first light (dawn) dew on grass, pink light.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Cheers Tony

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Thanks Dana for the feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ninadranade View Post
    Hi Team,

    Below was rejected for being undersharpened (soft).

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I have sharpened it. Please let me know if this is okay now.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9134[/ATTACH]
    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks,
    Ninad
    Looks ok to me. It was mostly the left side (tail) that was soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Hi Team,

    Below was rejected for being undersharpened (soft).

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I have sharpened it. Please let me know if this is okay now.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N294WN_09_18.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	980.2 KB
ID:	1017088
    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks,
    Ninad

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Poles aren't always totally reliable. I'd look at the buildings in the background, which are leaning a little to the right.
    Thanks, will adjust it!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Hi,
    This was rejected for horizon unlevel. I used the light poles on the left. What should I then use?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Thanks in advance!
    Poles aren't always totally reliable. I'd look at the buildings in the background, which are leaning a little to the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Hi,
    This was rejected for horizon unlevel. I used the light poles on the left. What should I then use?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Thanks in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ErezS View Post
    You're just too harsh against me lately.
    But that's your right.
    If you like to do this to one of the oldest photographers here, then be fun.
    Good Day.
    How was my response in any way harsh?

    Leave a comment:


  • ErezS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I noticed it, the screener who screened it noticed it, so perhaps your statement should have been "It's something that's not noticeable at all to me, but if you demand it ..."

    In any case, I'm not demanding it. You asked why it was rejected, I simply responded. If you're happy with the image, there's no need to make any changes.
    You're just too harsh against me lately.
    But that's your right.
    If you like to do this to one of the oldest photographers here, then be fun.
    Good Day.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ErezS View Post
    It's something that's not noticeable at all, but if you demand it ...
    I noticed it, the screener who screened it noticed it, so perhaps your statement should have been "It's something that's not noticeable at all to me, but if you demand it ..."

    In any case, I'm not demanding it. You asked why it was rejected, I simply responded. If you're happy with the image, there's no need to make any changes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ErezS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    The runway is sloping down to the right.
    It's something that's not noticeable at all, but if you demand it ...

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ErezS View Post
    Dear friends,
    It is hard for me to understand this rejection.
    But before I appeal, I would like to know why it was rejected?
    In my opinion this is very harsh decision, without real need.
    The runway is sloping down to the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • ErezS
    replied
    Dear friends,
    It is hard for me to understand this rejection.
    But before I appeal, I would like to know why it was rejected?
    In my opinion this is very harsh decision, without real need.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X