Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • crisquijano
    replied
    Thank you... good to know.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hi all, would this image be rejected for Motive... 3.5 Obstruction/Clutter. In the updated guidelines it says "Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

    Thank you for the input. -Cristian

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8577[/ATTACH]
    That is too much clutter.

    Leave a comment:


  • crisquijano
    replied
    Hi all, would this image be rejected for Motive... 3.5 Obstruction/Clutter. In the updated guidelines it says "Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

    Thank you for the input. -Cristian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	AMERICAN_N959AN_30AUG17_1200_ingate.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	964.1 KB
ID:	1016567

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    It looks soft, maybe even a bit blurry towards the nose. Vignetting can be avoided using a smaller aperture, f/8 for example.
    Thanks for the feedback !

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by ninadranade View Post
    Dear Team,

    Can you please help me to identify the rejections reasons in the photo so that i can improve on them and re-submit it.

    Rejected for 1. Unsharpened (soft) 2. Vignetting not allowed (i did not use a lens hood while taking the shot)


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6050571

    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks
    Ninad
    It looks soft, maybe even a bit blurry towards the nose. Vignetting can be avoided using a smaller aperture, f/8 for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • ninadranade
    replied
    Dear Team,

    Can you please help me to identify the rejections reasons in the photo so that i can improve on them and re-submit it.

    Rejected for 1. Unsharpened (soft) 2. Vignetting not allowed (i did not use a lens hood while taking the shot)


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6050571

    Thanks for your time.

    Thanks
    Ninad

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick Aviation Photos
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I'd personally crop a bit off the bottom, but it's probably ok as it is.
    Ok thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick Aviation Photos View Post
    Any thoughts? Could this photo get accepted? [ATTACH=CONFIG]8564[/ATTACH]
    I'd personally crop a bit off the bottom, but it's probably ok as it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick Aviation Photos
    replied
    Any thoughts? Could this photo get accepted? Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-SBG (2).jpg
Views:	3
Size:	280.7 KB
ID:	1016555

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Thanks a lot! I'll edit it and upload it again.
    Have a nice day.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey,

    today this picture get rejected due to horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6048842
    Iīve appealed that because i was to 100% sure that itīs leveled. As reference point i used the white rwy line under the watermark because the buildings in the background are washed out due to the engine heat.
    The appeal gets rejected: all buildings are "slightly leaning left".
    In my opinion itīs less than slightly but i canīt recheck the horizon - when i click on "horizon" in screening tools there is a pop up which means that my password is incorrect, i entered it again but nothing.

    I hope you can help me.
    Thanks a lot for your time and help in advance, have a nice day!!
    I'm biased, because I'm one of the (two) screeners who rejected it, but the verticals are leaning left for me. The treeline in the background also confirms this as it is much higher in the right half of the frame.

    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    Can someone tell me whats the problem with the contrast here?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6049873
    The light looks a bit harsh and washed out. Horizon might also be a little off.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Can someone tell me whats the problem with the contrast here?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6049873

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Hey,

    today this picture get rejected due to horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6048842
    Iīve appealed that because i was to 100% sure that itīs leveled. As reference point i used the white rwy line under the watermark because the buildings in the background are washed out due to the engine heat.
    The appeal gets rejected: all buildings are "slightly leaning left".
    In my opinion itīs less than slightly but i canīt recheck the horizon - when i click on "horizon" in screening tools there is a pop up which means that my password is incorrect, i entered it again but nothing.

    I hope you can help me.
    Thanks a lot for your time and help in advance, have a nice day!!

    Leave a comment:


  • andjeom
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Overall poor light on both. Second might be salvageable with a bit more contrast and brightened. First not sure there is much you can do to improve it.
    Thank you very much

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    is the amount of backlit too hight to get this photo accepted?

    Thank you.
    Marian

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8543[/ATTACH]
    Backlighting should not be an issue for this photo.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X