Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 71sbeetle
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    That's up to you. I can't guarantee whoever handles your appeal will agree with me.
    Like my Dad always tells me "qui ne tente rien n'a rien" (nothing ventured, nothing gained) so I appealed it and ..... it was rejected again lol
    I guess I'll give a try with another picture of the plane thank you for the help!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by 71sbeetle View Post
    Would it be worth an appeal you think? Don't want to take time off of the crew you guys and gals are already quite busy!
    That's up to you. I can't guarantee whoever handles your appeal will agree with me.

    Leave a comment:


  • 71sbeetle
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post


    Sharpness looks passable to me.
    Would it be worth an appeal you think? Don't want to take time off of the crew you guys and gals are already quite busy!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by huytrando View Post
    Hey guys, I just recently have a few rejections due to Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue). I wonder how can I fix these? Is it because the pictures look yellow-ish?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040665
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040666
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040664
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040667
    There is an odd yellow/green cast, but it should be easy enough to fix with a WB adjustment.

    Originally posted by austinshih90 View Post
    Hi!
    I wanted to try adding some close-up shots to the database but I have no experience in it. I wonder if such crop would work?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8467[/ATTACH]

    Many Thanks
    There is no problem with the crop.

    Originally posted by 71sbeetle View Post
    Got this one rejected for undersharpened/soft, I checked the full resolution file that was exported at the same time as the Jetphotos resolution and it is quite sharp, could it be just low contrast maybe? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6059373
    Sharpness looks passable to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • 71sbeetle
    replied
    Got this one rejected for undersharpened/soft, I checked the full resolution file that was exported at the same time as the Jetphotos resolution and it is quite sharp, could it be just low contrast maybe?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6059373

    Leave a comment:


  • austinshih90
    replied
    Hi!
    I wanted to try adding some close-up shots to the database but I have no experience in it. I wonder if such crop would work?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP337[1600px].jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1016469

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • huytrando
    replied
    Hey guys, I just recently have a few rejections due to Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue). I wonder how can I fix these? Is it because the pictures look yellow-ish?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040665
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040666
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040664
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040667

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    is the obstruction caused by ground power unit on this photo acceptable, or too much to reject the photo?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8439[/ATTACH]

    Thank you,
    Marian
    If it's noticed, yes. But I'd say 50/50 odds because of the color it would be missed in screening.

    Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6037943
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040078
    I was wondering how I can fix them from being dark/underexposed to be acceptable enough to be resubmitted or if they are just too far gone for use.
    Exposure needs to be increased a considerable amount. I would also adjust the color (more red) and sharpen as well.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	74388_1502654931.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	364.6 KB
ID:	1016464

    Leave a comment:


  • Lat1918
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6037943
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6040078
    I was wondering how I can fix them from being dark/underexposed to be acceptable enough to be resubmitted or if they are just too far gone for use.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobh
    replied
    Small prop will be the category I'm guessing as I did have warbird/vintage selected. Thanks very much for the feedback

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    is the obstruction caused by ground power unit on this photo acceptable, or too much to reject the photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-82029.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.3 KB
ID:	1016446

    Thank you,
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bobh View Post
    Hi, I had this photo rejected for, amongst other things, categories wrong or missing. Could someone please let me know what the issue was. Many thanks, Bob
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6052431
    Can't see which categories you submitted it as, but should have been Small Prop and Warbird/Vintage.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobh
    replied
    Hi, I had this photo rejected for, amongst other things, categories wrong or missing. Could someone please let me know what the issue was. Many thanks, Bob
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6052431

    Leave a comment:


  • niklas
    replied
    ah, sorry, no, i'm speaking of the same image redone by me and uploaded above in this thread, sorry for beeing confusing post #494, this thread

    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    We are speaking about this image, yes?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6035334

    It's 253k. I've tried on several different computers, and the same result. I've seen worse compression (some files we get are under 100k for a 1200 pix image) but generally the closer you get to 200k for any image over 1200 pix, the more likely you are to be able to see the compression in the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by niklas View Post
    This is very strange indead, on my hdd its 809k, even if i dl it from this thread i'm missing something here...
    We are speaking about this image, yes?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6035334

    It's 253k. I've tried on several different computers, and the same result. I've seen worse compression (some files we get are under 100k for a 1200 pix image) but generally the closer you get to 200k for any image over 1200 pix, the more likely you are to be able to see the compression in the image.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X