Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    Hey,
    I got this one rejected due obstructing objects and I think it's because of the grass. But in my eyes it not obstructing something like the whole plane. It's only not shoting centimeters of the wheel what is quite common for planes may be stowed or resting for longer times. The photo itself is not that bad so I don't understand why being so strict if there is only that liitle "problem"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6014823

    Thanks anyway
    I am sorry, but completely agree with the rejection of my screening collegues: the wheels/landing gear is too much obstructed.
    It would be different if it were a very rare plane that would never leave it's position again, but this is not a rare plane and it probably will leave the high grass sooner or later.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Hey,
    I got this one rejected due obstructing objects and I think it's because of the grass. But in my eyes it not obstructing something like the whole plane. It's only not shoting centimeters of the wheel what is quite common for planes may be stowed or resting for longer times. The photo itself is not that bad so I don't understand why being so strict if there is only that liitle "problem"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6014823

    Thanks anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    No.



    Be patient
    Thanks a lot!
    Have a nice day!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Hey,
    iīve visited ELLX today and they were a lots of Luxair. Each Aircraft has small but different stickers on the nose. (Cargolux: e.g. "Powered by Hellmann" / Luxair: e.g. "Letīs Make it Happen". or "Connecting you with banking".) Are those stickers considered as special scheme because every aircraft has another sentence?
    No.

    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    And what i have to do for uploading more than the normal 10 Pics per day and 20 queue slots?
    Be patient

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Hey,

    iīve visited ELLX today and they were a lots of Luxair. Each Aircraft has small but different stickers on the nose. (Cargolux: e.g. "Powered by Hellmann" / Luxair: e.g. "Letīs Make it Happen". or "Connecting you with banking".) Are those stickers considered as special scheme because every aircraft has another sentence?
    And what i have to do for uploading more than the normal 10 Pics per day and 20 queue slots?
    Thank you very much in advance, have a nice day!

    Leave a comment:


  • bluepanda7
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    I'm not sure that it will be possible. The problem is there is more light in the background than falling on the aircraft, which makes it look very dark against the bright sky. I've done my best on the left side here to adjust the levels to something more desireable, but no guarantee it would be enough to make the photo acceptable.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8192[/ATTACH]
    Ok, thanks for the help.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bluepanda7 View Post
    Hi,

    Is it possible to fix the contrast on this photo?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6007336

    Thanks
    I'm not sure that it will be possible. The problem is there is more light in the background than falling on the aircraft, which makes it look very dark against the bright sky. I've done my best on the left side here to adjust the levels to something more desireable, but no guarantee it would be enough to make the photo acceptable.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	26831_1500987793.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	583.5 KB
ID:	1016227

    Leave a comment:


  • bluepanda7
    replied
    Hi,

    Is it possible to fix the contrast on this photo?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6007336

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulSorensen
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both images are very washed out - there are no real blacks to be found anywhere in the frame. Checking the histogram confirms this.

    I've attached two edits where I've cleaned up the left side of the frame to give you an idea of what to aim for.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8190[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]8191[/ATTACH]
    Thanks so much for this, it is extremely helpful.

    Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulSorensen View Post
    I have submitted various photos without success so far but the most recent rejection has me stumped. Here is the image in question.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6006549

    Too much or too little contract is unhelpful, I am not even sure which of the two is supposed to be the problem.

    This was also rejected for the same thing, plus being undersharpened. I think it is a little bit soft, not undersharpened, so I will own that, but I am also not seeing the contrast issue.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6006558

    I would love some input about the contrast levels on these and whether anyone can tell me if it is too little or two much contrast.

    Thanks,

    Paul Sorensen
    Both images are very washed out - there are no real blacks to be found anywhere in the frame. Checking the histogram confirms this.

    I've attached two edits where I've cleaned up the left side of the frame to give you an idea of what to aim for.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	60126_1500934796.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	440.2 KB
ID:	1016225 Click image for larger version

Name:	70482_1500935407.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	471.3 KB
ID:	1016226

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulSorensen
    replied
    I have submitted various photos without success so far but the most recent rejection has me stumped. Here is the image in question.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6006549

    Too much or too little contract is unhelpful, I am not even sure which of the two is supposed to be the problem.

    This was also rejected for the same thing, plus being undersharpened. I think it is a little bit soft, not undersharpened, so I will own that, but I am also not seeing the contrast issue.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6006558

    I would love some input about the contrast levels on these and whether anyone can tell me if it is too little or two much contrast.

    Thanks,

    Paul Sorensen

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Hmmm strange as I did got the rejection mail but not the message with it. Doesn't matter as I reuploaded with the correct date and now it's fine

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    Whats the problem here? I did not make a HOT entry it automatically made it that way.

    Also where is the bad info? And how to correct it without any detailed information on what was wrong?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6020359
    There was a message with the rejection, so in the future (as Tomasz said) please check your email.

    In the off chance you didn't receive an email with the rejection, I can tell you the registration you entered is incorrect, it should be 64-14845
    Last edited by dlowwa; 2017-08-02, 18:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    I just have rejected this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5996661

    I am not sure about colors problem - is there red cast?

    Thanks
    Marian
    I see a slight red/orange cast.

    Leave a comment:


  • TomEPKK
    replied
    Screener left you message with details... please read e-mails from Jetphotos!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X