Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    I don't know about the Hot issue, but for the bad info, in looking at the rejected image, there is no C/N on there - that is probably what is missing.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Whats the problem here? I did not make a HOT entry it automatically made it that way.

    Also where is the bad info? And how to correct it without any detailed information on what was wrong?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6020359

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    I just have rejected this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5996661

    I am not sure about colors problem - is there red cast?

    Thanks
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • 71sbeetle
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Doesn't look that bad to me, but I suppose it could use a little more contrast.
    Thank you! I will add a little bit of contrast and then reupload, hopefully it will be good I almost appealed it (would be my first appeal ever) but looking at the histogram I can see what appears to be low contrast. Those new AA liveries are so tricky

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by 71sbeetle View Post
    I need some advice, I got this one rejected for too much or too little contrast (I'm assuming it's too little?) should I bump up the contrast in it or should I just not bother with it and move on to another picture? The reason I ask is because I tried putting more contrast but I just doesn't look right, so I'm thinking maybe I should just not upload this shot?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5990835
    Doesn't look that bad to me, but I suppose it could use a little more contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • 71sbeetle
    replied
    I need some advice, I got this one rejected for too much or too little contrast (I'm assuming it's too little?) should I bump up the contrast in it or should I just not bother with it and move on to another picture? The reason I ask is because I tried putting more contrast but I just doesn't look right, so I'm thinking maybe I should just not upload this shot?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5990835

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Yes, as advertised in the forum, we have updated the upload guideline on early july

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version


    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • Rik86
    replied
    Already read comment screener, but is it a new rule?
    Because I always post the various angles and positions, I look at the right hand on the landing and the same direction in the taxation. Do I see other photos as well because I was discarded?

    My photos in the database are these:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	14.7 KB
ID:	1016168

    The one just discarded is not similar
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5989930

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
    I have got this rejections today

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992552

    I can not really understand it, because i always level my photos on the edge of the runway and it was never a problem.
    Also i can not see the softness (is this word correct? you know what i mean)

    Same problem with this one
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992547

    It looks sharp to me and i used the category jetphotos gave me and many pictures of this plane are online with exact these informations.

    Thanks for your help.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992552
    Using the edge of the runway as reference, as you mention, is far less suitable than using known vertical references, as for example buildings. A runway is never level, a building usually is. The verticals in your photo are clearly leaning to the right.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992547
    This one needs more sharpening and needs Business Jet category, as it is an ACJ.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    I have got this rejections today

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992552

    I can not really understand it, because i always level my photos on the edge of the runway and it was never a problem.
    Also i can not see the softness (is this word correct? you know what i mean)

    Same problem with this one
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5992547

    It looks sharp to me and i used the category jetphotos gave me and many pictures of this plane are online with exact these informations.

    Thanks for your help.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by uveges13 View Post
    Hello
    Need some help.
    Rejection: "Similar photo uploaded"
    Why?
    I don't have a photo Air Canada Rouge.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989183

    Thank you!
    Best would be to appeal it.

    Leave a comment:


  • uveges13
    replied
    Hello
    Need some help.
    Rejection: "Similar photo uploaded"
    Why?
    I don't have a photo Air Canada Rouge.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989183

    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JetSetGB View Post
    Hi Admins,
    Just Checking if any of these could be appealed?
    I have begun to get overwhelmed now looking at the count of rejections I have received lately, and I have a feeling I need to revisit the Kindergarten school for editing.

    I was browsing the link at the upload page and was hoping to see if the acceptance parameters have recently changed, the below link seems to be broken.
    http://forums.jetphotos.com/showthre...oad-Guidelines

    Here are a few reject links which I thought did not have any defect/perhaps acceptable, and I would love to get constructive feedback on bettering the submission.

    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989639 (rejected for dark/underexposed & contrast)

    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989625 (rejected for dark/underexposed, contrast & backlit, I thought the tail was not casting any shadow?)

    3. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989326 (the Horizon seems ok to me looking at the vertical lines from the terminal)

    4. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988077 ( Some more information on bad color reject would be appreciated)

    5. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988067 ( I am not sure about any window dirt since it was a brand new aircraft with no smudges/dirt, perhaps I am unable to see any glare)

    6. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5986976

    7. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979571 (Any particular area which has remained soft which can be taken care in the fresh edit)

    Many thanks in advance for your time,

    Cheers!

    Girish
    A few of those rejections seem a little harsh, in particular the first three. While the light is not great on the first two, I probably would have accepted them. You are correct the BR 77W is not backlit. I also agree about the level on the CX. I don't see anything from the verticals that it is not level, so benefit of the doubt. Feel free to appeal, but of course my opinion doesn't guarantee your appeal will be successful

    The other four look like justified rejections to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JetSetGB
    replied
    Hi Admins,
    Just Checking if any of these could be appealed?
    I have begun to get overwhelmed now looking at the count of rejections I have received lately, and I have a feeling I need to revisit the Kindergarten school for editing.

    I was browsing the link at the upload page and was hoping to see if the acceptance parameters have recently changed, the below link seems to be broken.
    http://forums.jetphotos.com/showthre...oad-Guidelines

    Here are a few reject links which I thought did not have any defect/perhaps acceptable, and I would love to get constructive feedback on bettering the submission.

    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989639 (rejected for dark/underexposed & contrast)

    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989625 (rejected for dark/underexposed, contrast & backlit, I thought the tail was not casting any shadow?)

    3. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5989326 (the Horizon seems ok to me looking at the vertical lines from the terminal)

    4. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988077 ( Some more information on bad color reject would be appreciated)

    5. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988067 ( I am not sure about any window dirt since it was a brand new aircraft with no smudges/dirt, perhaps I am unable to see any glare)

    6. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5986976

    7. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979571 (Any particular area which has remained soft which can be taken care in the fresh edit)

    Many thanks in advance for your time,

    Cheers!

    Girish

    Leave a comment:


  • pilotgolfer
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi Ryan,
    First one : big noise issue indeed but also could have been rejected for cut off as it's not really a tail shot but more an angle and a cropping that only shows the back part of a plane , there's too much fuselage for a tail shot

    2nd, missed cargo indeed

    3rd, composition works for me but the screener should have selected dark and over sharpening. Needs a complete re-edit imo

    4th, unfortunnaly it's really blurry, even the wing, and I doubt it has any chance.

    regards
    Awesome, thank you. I'll give the second and third ones another go and shelve the other two.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X