Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Hi Ryan,
    First one : big noise issue indeed but also could have been rejected for cut off as it's not really a tail shot but more an angle and a cropping that only shows the back part of a plane , there's too much fuselage for a tail shot

    2nd, missed cargo indeed

    3rd, composition works for me but the screener should have selected dark and over sharpening. Needs a complete re-edit imo

    4th, unfortunnaly it's really blurry, even the wing, and I doubt it has any chance.

    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • pilotgolfer
    replied
    Howdy there!
    I've had a few rejections for various reasons recently and wondering about them.

    For this one, is there anything else besides the noise issue?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5978213

    I can see the dust after it got rejected. I'm not sure why I missed it before. That and I obviously missed the cargo category (or was it special scheme for the 25?). It was pretty cool to see, though!
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5984134

    For this one I wanted to include the 748 to balance the picture out a little bit. Is the MD-80 too high here?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988698

    Finally, we were delayed a couple hours, so we didn't take off until after sunset and this was the view as it was. For the scene I wanted to capture, is it too dark for here? I also see the window frame in the bottom corners when it's equalized now. Also, was the dark sky in the corners contribute to the vignetting reason? I was using my 10-18 wide angle and that's as far as the light went in the sky. Is there any way I can rework it for here or is it for personal?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5988726

    Besides those reasons, is there anything else to spruce these pictures up to database standards?

    I appreciate it and thanks a bunch!

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5980665
    I got this one rejected for bad genre. Unfortunatley I don't remeber which one was selected (I think I selected "civilian" because it has civilian reg, and according to guidelines aircraft operated by government are considered civilian), can you please check it up? And which genre should be selected?

    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bluepanda7 View Post
    Hi,

    I have got a few rejections for over sharpening, in particular this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979337

    Is there a way that I can tell it is oversharpened?

    Thanks
    There are jaggies visible pretty much everywhere there is a hard transition - titles, colour transitions on the paint, leading edges, gear, etc..

    Leave a comment:


  • bluepanda7
    replied
    Hi,

    I have got a few rejections for over sharpening, in particular this one:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5979337

    Is there a way that I can tell it is oversharpened?

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    It looks unleveled but the verticals are verticals so I believe it's level.

    Regards
    Alex
    Thanks for your fast reply Alex! I thought exactly the same

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Not sure if the horizon is correct on this one? Used the pole in the background.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8013[/ATTACH]
    It looks unleveled but the verticals are verticals so I believe it's level.

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Bjorn,
    You pic was screened, rejected, your appeal was rejected that's the end of the screening process. It means a senior or an admin has already seen it. Whatever happens then in the forum is not going to reverse the screening process or that would be just like opening a Pandora box. Just reupload it with the advice given on appeal and it'll be fine.

    Cheers
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Not sure if the horizon is correct on this one? Used the pole in the background.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DISAR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	407.7 KB
ID:	1016080

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    Originally posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Still waiting for a correct reply. Original post was a week ago.
    From what I can see your appeal was rejected by a senior screener/appeal screener already. So you just need to re-edit. The opinion given by the other screener was just that, an opinion, it was not the final answer to your question and was not a senior screener decision. I think you migh have got confused there.
    Last edited by B7772ADL; 2017-07-19, 18:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bjorn1979
    replied
    Originally posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Still looking forward to a reply
    Still waiting for a correct reply. Original post was a week ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by janamparikh View Post
    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!
    Try to use vertical references in the center of the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • janamparikh
    replied
    I have a few pictures from the same location which have been rejected due to horizon. How do we take the reference for horizon? If you see the airplanes parked in the hangar on the top left, they are drooping on the right (CW). Hence wanted to know. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by janamparikh View Post
    Just wish to know if the below post is leveled in terms of horizon or not.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8645819
    The image has already been accepted. Why are you asking?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bjorn1979
    replied
    Originally posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Any senior screener who is going to accept my appeal ?
    Still looking forward to a reply

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X