Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by austinshih90 View Post
    Hi,

    I got this rejection for overexposing it. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5929475
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7879[/ATTACH]
    Is it better now?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7880[/ATTACH]
    and...what about this additional one?

    Thanks.
    first one still has clipped highlights. the second one has a harsh contrast, the shadows are too strong and lack details.

    Leave a comment:


  • austinshih90
    replied
    Hi,

    I got this rejection for overexposing it. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5929475
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP284-2[1400px].jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1015973
    Is it better now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	679.8 KB
ID:	1015974
    and...what about this additional one?

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Originally posted by Rik86 View Post
    I await news.
    Thank you
    Crop the Lufthansa through the gap between the pair of windows just after the last letter of LUFTHANSA. The Lufthansa is too low in the frame. Centre it by having the top of the roof to top of frame measurement the same as the belly to bottom of frame.

    The same goes for the BA shot but it is very soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rik86
    replied
    Originally posted by Rik86 View Post
    Sorry, this is not dark.
    The lighting is that of the late afternoon.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415

    Thank you
    Originally posted by Rik86 View Post
    Excuse me, because this is not good.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806

    Instead this, okay?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674

    Thank you
    I await news.
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • mtaylor334
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    It needs a fair amount of brightening. There is lots of room on the right side of the histogram to brighten it without blowing out any highlights. See the left side here:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7876[/ATTACH]

    It also seems borderline soft/blurry, so I might also suggest uploading at a smaller size than 1800 next time.
    Thanks for your advice. I will see what I can do.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mtaylor334 View Post
    Hi there

    Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5927256

    This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.

    Many thanks
    Mark
    It needs a fair amount of brightening. There is lots of room on the right side of the histogram to brighten it without blowing out any highlights. See the left side here:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	50202_1497091963.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	782.3 KB
ID:	1015971

    It also seems borderline soft/blurry, so I might also suggest uploading at a smaller size than 1800 next time.

    Leave a comment:


  • mtaylor334
    replied
    Hi there

    Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5927256

    This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.

    Many thanks
    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Don't see any issues with compression, though they do seem a touch high in the frame. Given that wasn't included in the rejection reasons, it shouldn't be an issue the second time around.
    Okay thanks! Seems that I have finally found the good settings.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JVSpotter View Post
    Hi,
    I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926437
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926436
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926432

    I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7870[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7871[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7872[/ATTACH]

    Thanks in advance,
    Jesse
    Don't see any issues with compression, though they do seem a touch high in the frame. Given that wasn't included in the rejection reasons, it shouldn't be an issue the second time around.

    Leave a comment:


  • JesseV
    replied
    Hi,
    I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926437
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926436
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5926432

    I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BKS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	406.5 KB
ID:	1015965Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FRP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	415.5 KB
ID:	1015966Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-CDE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	435.1 KB
ID:	1015967

    Thanks in advance,
    Jesse

    Leave a comment:


  • Rik86
    replied
    Sorry, this is not dark.
    The lighting is that of the late afternoon.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Rik86
    replied
    Excuse me, because this is not good.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806

    Instead this, okay?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by ErezS View Post
    Alex,
    I know it's your local airport.
    But I still don't understand the point of reference here.


    Best regards,
    Erez.
    Use the buildings in the background. They should be level. This is not a JP rule, just common sense. I'm now the third screener replying to you regarding the last two photos. I hope, that is enough. We also want to get the queue under control, which is still too large.

    Leave a comment:


  • ErezS
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Strong ccw rotation needed., don't ask me for reference, it's my local airport.

    For the take-off shot. CW (0.3) rotation needed.
    Alex,
    I know it's your local airport.
    But I still don't understand the point of reference here.


    Best regards,
    Erez.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyCrow
    replied
    Thank you for the explanation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X