NEW Editing advice thread

[71sbeetle]

Sharpness looks passable to me.

Would it be worth an appeal you think? Don't want to take time off of the crew you guys and gals are already quite busy!

[dlowwa]

Would it be worth an appeal you think? Don't want to take time off of the crew you guys and gals are already quite busy!

That's up to you. I can't guarantee whoever handles your appeal will agree with me.

[71sbeetle]

That's up to you. I can't guarantee whoever handles your appeal will agree with me.

Like my Dad always tells me "qui ne tente rien n'a rien" (nothing ventured, nothing gained) so I appealed it and ..... it was rejected again lol
I guess I'll give a try with another picture of the plane thank you for the help!

[DirtyCrow]

Hey guys,
got this rejected for Horizon

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6042972

As far i can see, the edge of the runway is level, the windowline of the terminal is level and the wall of the terminal is correct vertical. Do i oversee something?

[dlowwa]

Hey guys,
got this rejected for Horizon

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6042972

As far i can see, the edge of the runway is level, the windowline of the terminal is level and the wall of the terminal is correct vertical. Do i oversee something?

From the verticals it seems to me it might need slight CCW.

[DirtyCrow]

You mean the Lights? Thats probably right, but whats about the building? A few weeks ago i got rejection for leveling on someting other then a bulding and was told, walls and roofs are always the main reference.

[Sergio Canobbio]

Hello. I'm trying to recovery some old photos. Would these be acceptable?

[TomEPKK]

Hello. I'm trying to recovery some old photos. Would these be acceptable?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8487[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8488[/ATTACH]

Unfortunately quality is very low on both...

[Sergio Canobbio]

Unfortunately quality is very low on both...

In your opinion, is there some processing that could be done to improve at least the first one? Thank you.

[dlowwa]

You mean the Lights? Thats probably right, but whats about the building? A few weeks ago i got rejection for leveling on someting other then a bulding and was told, walls and roofs are always the main reference.

No, the building appears to be leaning ever-so slightly as well, but to be honest, it's not something I would have rejected for since it's barely noticeable.

In your opinion, is there some processing that could be done to improve at least the first one? Thank you.

Unfortunately, besides the massive amount of noise (which may or may not be fixable), they are also blurry, which is definitely not fixable with more processing.

[andjeom]

Hello guys, It's my first time posting in the forum and I would like to get some help with 2 photos I just got rejected.

- This was like my 3rd attempt with this pic but it always get rejected over contrast issues, I don't know whether decrease or increase contrast.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044064

- About this one I would like to know if it's fixable, I know the weather was very bad that day but i'm affraid I don't have another pic of those F-16
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6044313

Thanks a lot for your help.

[kiwikieran]

Thoughts please? Thanks for the help

[Nick Aviation Photos]

Thoughts please? Thanks for the help
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8498[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8497[/ATTACH]

Great shots! The only thing I would suggest is increasing the contrast on both photos

[kiwikieran]

Great shots! The only thing I would suggest is increasing the contrast on both photos

Thanks Nick will do!

[JesseV]

Hi,
As this was previous rejected, I would like to know if its better now.
Rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6045410
New one:

Thanks in advance!