Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW Editing advice thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AlpTownend
    replied
    Do you think these would get past screening?

    Would these get past screening?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6172810
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6172448
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6172538
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6172552
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6172563
    Your opinion would be very helpful
    Thank You
    Alp

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi guys.

    Is this one really that underexposed? And is it fixable? I'm affraid that even slightest brightening may blow out white areas.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6153883

    Thanks
    Anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hi Everyyone

    Again I consult you for these rejections. In my opinion, especially in Sky Airline were very hard.

    Regards!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6156504

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6156524
    Both are valid rejections. The first is quite soft, almost blurry, while the second is definitely lacking in contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Hi Everyyone

    Again I consult you for these rejections. In my opinion, especially in Sky Airline were very hard.

    Regards!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6156504

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6156524

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Slight yellow cast I suppose, but wouldn't have warranted a color rejection for me.
    Originally posted by seahawk View Post
    Worth an appeal, if you selected night shot. We can not change the categories in the appeal process, so if it is not selected we would have to reject the appeal for categories.
    Thank you for your comments. Photo appeal was accepted.

    Regards
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    I agree with my colleagues decision. The aircraft is a bit too high and the top of the fuselage shows clipped highlights, as can also be seen in the histogram.
    ok, thanks again!!

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys.

    Is this one really that underexposed? And is it fixable? I'm affraid that even slightest brightening may blow out white areas.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6153883

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • seahawk
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    one of my uploads was rejected due vignetting and bad colors:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6151460

    Can you help me to identify, which color cast is present?

    Thank you
    Marian
    Worth an appeal, if you selected night shot. We can not change the categories in the appeal process, so if it is not selected we would have to reject the appeal for categories.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    one of my uploads was rejected due vignetting and bad colors:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6151460

    Can you help me to identify, which color cast is present?

    Thank you
    Marian
    Slight yellow cast I suppose, but wouldn't have warranted a color rejection for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hi,

    one of my uploads was rejected due vignetting and bad colors:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6151460

    Can you help me to identify, which color cast is present?

    Thank you
    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by MartinezRoe7 View Post
    Hello everyone

    I wanted to consult the following image to see if the rejection is good.

    Thank you in advance for your time to help me.

    Regards!


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6148705
    I agree with my colleagues decision. The aircraft is a bit too high and the top of the fuselage shows clipped highlights, as can also be seen in the histogram.

    Leave a comment:


  • MartinezRoe7
    replied
    Hello everyone

    I wanted to consult the following image to see if the rejection is good.

    Thank you in advance for your time to help me.

    Regards!


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6148705

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Dark tones are too bright there (this leads to a overexposure or too little contrast rejection - probably the nose is a bit blown out)
    Ive tried to edit your picture but its a bit tricky without the original file. The expamle below is ok in my opinion but for the final result best try the pre-screening thread, because im not a screener.
    The left side of the example below should be ok (right side is your original):
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10300[/ATTACH]

    Second one have too liitle contrast - the dark tones are too bright. (a gap on the left side of the histogram)
    The left side of the example below should be ok (right side is your original):
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10299[/ATTACH]

    I hope this will help you a bit.
    Have a nice evening.
    Thanks Julian - amazing how two screens can be totally different - even when they have been set up with a Spyder Pro!!! Appreciate it!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    Julian, many thanks! I already corrected and sent. The photo was already accepted (as this shot is a First Registration).

    Best!

    Vinicius
    Great to hear that all the best for you and your pictures!

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
    Ive added red lines on the facade of the hangar in the picture below and have cropped it a bit for better visibility. Those vertical lines are used for reference.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10305[/ATTACH]
    Julian, many thanks! I already corrected and sent. The photo was already accepted (as this shot is a First Registration).

    Best!

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X