Originally posted by brianw999
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NEW Editing advice thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Hi Team,
Below was rejected for to much or too little contrast.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6127868
I have done changes, please let me know if this is fine now.
Thanks,
Ninad
Comment
-
Hi Team,
Below was rejected for to soft
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6127686
I have done changes, please let me know if this is fine now.
Thanks,
Ninad
Comment
-
Moulin Rouge, Folies bergeres and other naughty French words!
I've been trying to upload this one for a while; I thought I'd got all of the dust spots, but evidement sans succes! Merde!
Can you please point them out and I shall have them removed and sent to Devil's island ...
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6129909
Comment
-
Hi! Could you please help me to understand an acceptable level of obstruction when the wheels obstructed by grass. I saw some photos in the JP db when the wheels were slightly obstructed by grass. At the same time I saw several topics on rejection in similar situation. So I try to realise when "acceptable" become "rejected" in case obstruction by grass.
For example what's your opinion about photo like this:
wheel
Comment
-
Originally posted by akerosid View PostMoulin Rouge, Folies bergeres and other naughty French words!
I've been trying to upload this one for a while; I thought I'd got all of the dust spots, but evidement sans succes! Merde!
Can you please point them out and I shall have them removed and sent to Devil's island ...
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6129909
I have had a look at your photo and have found some spots, but i think the spot in the middle of the picture is the most visible. It´s possible that some dust spots that i have marked, are compression artefacts.
I hope this will help you a bit
Good luck for the future and btw, nice picture
Have a nice evening.Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ninadranade View PostHi Team,
Below was rejected for to much or too little contrast.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6127868
I have done changes, please let me know if this is fine now.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9948[/ATTACH]
Thanks,
Ninad[ATTACH=CONFIG]9948[/ATTACH]
Originally posted by ninadranade View PostHi Team,
Below was rejected for to soft
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6127686
I have done changes, please let me know if this is fine now.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9949[/ATTACH]
Thanks,
Ninad
Originally posted by akerosid View PostMoulin Rouge, Folies bergeres and other naughty French words!
I've been trying to upload this one for a while; I thought I'd got all of the dust spots, but evidement sans succes! Merde!
Can you please point them out and I shall have them removed and sent to Devil's island ...
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6129909
Comment
-
Originally posted by MAG View PostHi! Could you please help me to understand an acceptable level of obstruction when the wheels obstructed by grass. I saw some photos in the JP db when the wheels were slightly obstructed by grass. At the same time I saw several topics on rejection in similar situation. So I try to realise when "acceptable" become "rejected" in case obstruction by grass.
For example what's your opinion about photo like this:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10042[/ATTACH]
wheel
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10043[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10044[/ATTACH]
Originally posted by pauwelsc View PostI added this picture to the queue:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10071[/ATTACH]
afterwords I checked the equalised version:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10072[/ATTACH]
Is this overprocessed? How can I improve this?
Thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostGenerally, anything blocking more than half the wheel will be considered obstruction. Your examples are borderline, as the grass seems to be just about half way up.
Yes, this is overprocessed. Impossible to say how to avoid it without knowing either your complete editing workflow or camera settings, but doubtlessly it's caused by one of the two.
Comment
-
In general I am rather conservative regarding 'experiments'. However, this shot I took in Zurich is special with respect to the condensations behind the wings and the shadow of the vertical stabilizer in the clouds. So, is there a chance for this image? Do you have any suggestions to improve it?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6134224
Many thanks,
Peter
Comment
-
Originally posted by brianw999 View PostThe registration is listed in http://www.scramble.nl/military-database as being military. It requires business jet category as it is not part of an airline.
Thanks.
Comment
-
Hello everyone
I have some photos where I would like an advise. Im not used to upload photos where part of the aircraft is cut out/off. I dont do it because I have trouble cropping the photo when part of the aircraft is missing. However Im trying with some photos I took and I want you guys to check them out. Thank you
Comment
Comment