Originally posted by austinshih90
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NEW Editing advice thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Hi,
I got this rejection for overexposing it. >> https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5929475
Is it better now?
and...what about this additional one?
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rik86 View PostI await news.
Thank you
The same goes for the BA shot but it is very soft.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rik86 View PostSorry, this is not dark.
The lighting is that of the late afternoon.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415
Thank youOriginally posted by Rik86 View PostExcuse me, because this is not good.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806
Instead this, okay?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674
Thank you
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostIt needs a fair amount of brightening. There is lots of room on the right side of the histogram to brighten it without blowing out any highlights. See the left side here:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]7876[/ATTACH]
It also seems borderline soft/blurry, so I might also suggest uploading at a smaller size than 1800 next time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mtaylor334 View PostHi there
Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.
Many thanks
Mark
It also seems borderline soft/blurry, so I might also suggest uploading at a smaller size than 1800 next time.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi there
Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.
Many thanks
Mark
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostDon't see any issues with compression, though they do seem a touch high in the frame. Given that wasn't included in the rejection reasons, it shouldn't be an issue the second time around.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JVSpotter View PostHi,
I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]7870[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7871[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7872[/ATTACH]
Thanks in advance,
Jesse
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
Thanks in advance,
Jesse
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry, this is not dark.
The lighting is that of the late afternoon.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Excuse me, because this is not good.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806
Instead this, okay?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ErezS View PostAlex,
I know it's your local airport.
But I still don't understand the point of reference here.
Best regards,
Erez.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View PostStrong ccw rotation needed., don't ask me for reference, it's my local airport.
For the take-off shot. CW (0.3) rotation needed.
I know it's your local airport.
But I still don't understand the point of reference here.
Best regards,
Erez.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: