I had some photos rejected on appeal and the screener also suggested that they should have been rejected for compression artefacts too. The screener also suggested that I should "save in a higher quality".
But I always save in the highest quality available. This rejection reason is coming up increasingly and I would like to put a lid on it.
When I have done all the bits and bobs - sharpening, cropping, etc etc and then reducing to the acceptable size, I then save the photo under a file name; I am then asked to pick the image quality and I always pick "maximum".
Is there anything further I should be doing that I am not doing during the preparation process, that would avoid compression artefacts. I have asked (and I know others have asked) this question before, but the reason given last time was different.
But I always save in the highest quality available. This rejection reason is coming up increasingly and I would like to put a lid on it.
When I have done all the bits and bobs - sharpening, cropping, etc etc and then reducing to the acceptable size, I then save the photo under a file name; I am then asked to pick the image quality and I always pick "maximum".
Is there anything further I should be doing that I am not doing during the preparation process, that would avoid compression artefacts. I have asked (and I know others have asked) this question before, but the reason given last time was different.
Comment