Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Overexposed rejection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Overexposed rejection

    Admin ask me to write in here, can any one explain me what wrong with exposition on those two pictures ?
    Histogram looks ok.
    In the past I have some similar rejection reasons, with your help maybe I will avoid further problems.
    regards PM.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5496032
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5494597

  • #2
    Hi Pawel,
    Thanks for coming on the forum for the assistance !!

    On the 380, the overexposure isn't that bad. It's mainly the lights and a bit on the nose. Would be good to boost the contrast a bit though. But nice photo, really !
    The 777 also needs a bit more contrast and don't forget the cargo category

    Best regards
    Alex

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by paulek View Post
      Admin ask me to write in here, can any one explain me what wrong with exposition on those two pictures ?
      Histogram looks ok.
      In the past I have some similar rejection reasons, with your help maybe I will avoid further problems.
      regards PM.
      Hi, I think I was the one who rejected those. Both have some blown-out areas (the 'forehead' on the 380, and the tail on the 77F), and as Alex mentioned some more contrast would help, but they just need some minor adjustments and they should be acceptable.

      Comment

      Working...
      X