Hello,
So I have this image rejected for a vignette: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5677644
I went and appealed citing that vignettes will present with darker/brighter corners, which this does not have. I presented my case utilizing an accepted example which did have darkened corners. My response from the appeal: "Pointing on somebody\'s else picture to get to your point is considered as rude and makes your appeal rejected automatically. If you want to do so, do it openly in the forum or contact the photographer directly if you have an issue with his picture."
Since when is backing a statement/claim with examples rude? I'm not ridiculing the other photographer. However, the screener response is basically telling me I should go email the photographer or openly blast them on the forum, which is not who I am. I never said I had an issue with the photo, I was just pointing out my explanation as to what I feel is a vignette and why I feel my picture was wrongfully rejected while something like that got accepted. I'm on the other aviation sites and have utilized other people's pictures in my appeal arguments on there. To me it allows for a visual representation and it allows for dialogue between screener and photographer. It has allowed for explanations if my image is rejected on appeal, a simple email with a thank you as well has occurred.
Now with that said, my appeal was never even judged and automatically rejected per the screener comment. Do I have the ability to file another appeal on it? I
So I have this image rejected for a vignette: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5677644
I went and appealed citing that vignettes will present with darker/brighter corners, which this does not have. I presented my case utilizing an accepted example which did have darkened corners. My response from the appeal: "Pointing on somebody\'s else picture to get to your point is considered as rude and makes your appeal rejected automatically. If you want to do so, do it openly in the forum or contact the photographer directly if you have an issue with his picture."
Since when is backing a statement/claim with examples rude? I'm not ridiculing the other photographer. However, the screener response is basically telling me I should go email the photographer or openly blast them on the forum, which is not who I am. I never said I had an issue with the photo, I was just pointing out my explanation as to what I feel is a vignette and why I feel my picture was wrongfully rejected while something like that got accepted. I'm on the other aviation sites and have utilized other people's pictures in my appeal arguments on there. To me it allows for a visual representation and it allows for dialogue between screener and photographer. It has allowed for explanations if my image is rejected on appeal, a simple email with a thank you as well has occurred.
Now with that said, my appeal was never even judged and automatically rejected per the screener comment. Do I have the ability to file another appeal on it? I
Comment