over processed/bad postprocessing.

[mardayvirin]

Hello
Two photos rejected with comment over processed/bad postprocessing.
I would be grafefull if someone from the screening team can give me a bit more feedback so I know what I am doing wrong when editing. Most of my rejects are always over processed/bad processing with no other comments.
Many thanks
Chris

[dlowwa]

Hello
Two photos rejected with comment over processed/bad postprocessing.
I would be grafefull if someone from the screening team can give me a bit more feedback so I know what I am doing wrong when editing. Most of my rejects are always over processed/bad processing with no other comments.
Many thanks
Chris[ATTACH=CONFIG]8081[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8082[/ATTACH]

Mmmmm... there are some very light halos around the aircraft, noticeable especially where the wing crosses above the fuselage, and the SAS as some strange effect in the sky. That having been said, the halos are barely enough to warrant a rejection, imho. I might have had issues with the odd effect in the sky of the SAS shot, but I wouldn't have rejected the Qatar for bad processing.

If you're interested in eliminating the halos completely, they're usually introduced through such things as D-lighting on Nikon cameras, or using the shadow/highlight or clarity tools (or other similar) in Photoshop.

[mardayvirin]

Thank you very much dlowwa, appreciate your time.