Help with this rejection

[romarja]

I have got this photo rejected because part of aircraft cut off. I appealed it but it was rejected again.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5975748

This is photo mine was approved some months ago.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8186359

Can anyone tell me where is the different?

Thank you

[dlowwa]

I have got this photo rejected because part of aircraft cut off. I appealed it but it was rejected again.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5975748

This is photo mine was approved some months ago.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8186359

Can anyone tell me where is the different?

Thank you

I'd say you got lucky with the accepted image. We usually reject images where the wing/stabilizer have been cropped for no good reason.

[romarja]

I can put a lot of more "lucky" examples like this. Why can we have more free to take different angles while composition is right? Because for other side, there is a limitation if you take same plane from the same view even in different dates but this i can understand it.

[Mumpitzjaeger]

I'd say you got lucky with the accepted image. We usually reject images where the wing/stabilizer have been cropped for no good reason.

Seams like lots of people are getting lucky.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8659265
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8659203
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8658800
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8658775

Don't get me wrong, I think these images are just fine - I like them.
But romarja's cropping makes perfect sense to me considering the angle of his picture, plus there are lots of similar images here on JP.

[LX-A343]

Seams like lots of people are getting lucky.
(...)

What you don't see is, how many such photos are rejected.

[dlowwa]

Seams like lots of people are getting lucky.

As I said, these types of shots are typically rejected, something (as Gerardo pointed out) you wouldn't know unless you were able to see what happens behind the scenes. If you choose not to believe me, that's fine