Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Info rejection help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Info rejection help

    Hi, I had this shot rejected for "Bad Info: Airline".

    I'd uploaded it as a 'ramp' shot as I didn't think either plane was sufficiently dominant to use its reg. Should it be uploaded as a shot of the Westjet?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	47969_1504954461.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	620.6 KB
ID:	1044993

    Thanks for any help.

  • #2
    Originally posted by scbriml View Post
    Hi, I had this shot rejected for "Bad Info: Airline".

    I'd uploaded it as a 'ramp' shot as I didn't think either plane was sufficiently dominant to use its reg. Should it be uploaded as a shot of the Westjet?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9188[/ATTACH]

    Thanks for any help.
    Hi,
    Yes please with the 737 reg - ramp shots request at least 3 planes in the frame.
    What a nice shot BTW !!

    cheers
    Alex

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
      Hi,
      Yes please with the 737 reg - ramp shots request at least 3 planes in the frame.
      What a nice shot BTW !!

      cheers
      Alex
      Hi Alex, thanks for that.

      However, I'm slightly confused (not unusual!)

      The Upload Guidelines here (https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version) make no mention of 'ramp shots'.

      However, a previous version which I had downloaded (dated 27th August 2016) says - "Where there are two or more aircraft in an image and none of them form a majority part of the image then they should be uploaded as a Ramp shot. "Majority part" means 60% or more of the image." It was on that basis that I uploaded this image as a ramp shot.

      Appreciate any additional clarification you can provide. Cheers.

      Regards,
      Steve.

      Comment


      • #4
        I stand corrected but still I think your pic doesn't really represent a ramp view and would be better uploaded with the 737 info.

        Regards
        Alex

        Comment


        • #5
          OK thanks, Alex.

          Comment

          Working...
          X