Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

YanS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hi everyone,

    Thanks dlowwa for your feedback again.

    I have got a few new ones for pre-screening:
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9845 1v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1032558
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9894v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1032559
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0144v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1032560
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0276v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	954.9 KB
ID:	1032561

    Thanks for your answers,
    Best regards,
    Yannick
    Last edited by YanS; 2019-01-23, 19:26. Reason: addad the EK ;)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by YanS View Post
      Hi everyone,

      Thanks dlowwa for your feedback again.

      I have got a few new ones for pre-screening:
      1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21333[/ATTACH]
      2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21334[/ATTACH]
      3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21335[/ATTACH]
      4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21336[/ATTACH]

      Thanks for your answers,
      Best regards,
      Yannick
      Horizon looks a touch off on the first and last, but otherwise would be ok for me.

      Comment


      • Hello everyone,

        A feedback on these would be great .

        1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0092v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,017.0 KB
ID:	1032699 (horizon looks a bit unlevelled to me but the verticals seem ok)
        2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0142v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,014.0 KB
ID:	1032700 (not sure if it's too similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9188422 )
        3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9973v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1032701
        4.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0343v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.7 KB
ID:	1032702
        5.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9934v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1032703 (too dark/too harsh contrast?)

        Thanks for your answers,
        All the best,
        Yannick

        Comment


        • Originally posted by YanS View Post
          Hello everyone,

          A feedback on these would be great .

          1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21521[/ATTACH] (horizon looks a bit unlevelled to me but the verticals seem ok)
          2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21522[/ATTACH] (not sure if it's too similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9188422 )
          3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21523[/ATTACH]
          4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21524[/ATTACH]
          5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21525[/ATTACH] (too dark/too harsh contrast?)

          Thanks for your answers,
          All the best,
          Yannick
          1,2) borderline soft (not similar)
          3, 4, 5) OK
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • Hello everyone,

            Yesterday I had the chance to take a photo of this Bae Jetstream 32. The serial is 842. As far as I know the aircraft is stored at EDDW since 2010. Now it has a new livery and a new reg. (HB-ARFF).Previously it was SP-KWE. My questions would be if I should
            enter 'private' for Airline as it doesn't have the 'JetAir'-titles anymore and if the picture would have a chance to be accepted as a new reg. .

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0549v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1032740

            Thanks for your help,
            Best regards,
            Yannick

            Comment


            • HB-ARFF isn't a valid reg so as it's fake I would recommend using the real one (last one) or upload without reg at all, just the cn

              Regards
              Alex

              To check any HB- reg - this is the place to go : https://app02.bazl.admin.ch/web/bazl/fr/#/lfr/search

              Comment


              • Hi everyone,

                Thanks, Alex for your help. I think I'll give it a try with the last reg. .

                I'm not sure about the quality of these:
                1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0010v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,001.4 KB
ID:	1032759 (too far?)
                2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0358v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1032760 (very borderline backlit for me)
                3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0169v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,011.3 KB
ID:	1032761 (is the LH behind enough to 'de-center' the BA?)


                Thanks for your replies,
                Best regards,
                Yannick

                Comment


                • Hi Yannick,
                  1. Pic looks a bit too dark, lacks some saturation and is a bit soft
                  2. Nice one, could go with a tad more contrast via levels
                  3. Interesting one, composition works well

                  Cheers
                  Alex

                  Comment


                  • Hi everyone,

                    Thanks Alex, for your answer!

                    Today this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7106062 ) was rejected for being to soft and horizon unlevel.
                    Personally I do not agree with these two aspects:
                    For me the aircraft is not soft enough for a rejection and the verticals in the beckground seem to be ok to me.

                    But of course this is only a personal opinion so I ask here if this one would be worth an appeal.

                    Thanks for your help,
                    Best regards,
                    Yannick

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                      Hi everyone,

                      Thanks Alex, for your answer!

                      Today this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7106062 ) was rejected for being to soft and horizon unlevel.
                      Personally I do not agree with these two aspects:
                      For me the aircraft is not soft enough for a rejection and the verticals in the beckground seem to be ok to me.

                      But of course this is only a personal opinion so I ask here if this one would be worth an appeal.

                      Thanks for your help,
                      Best regards,
                      Yannick
                      Not worth an appeal, imho.

                      Comment


                      • Hi everyone,

                        Thanks dlowwa, for your help!

                        A feedback on these three would be great. I'm not sure about horizon and contrast/soft on these.

                        1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0671v3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1032932 (would this be ok as first reg. ? It would be the second Ryan Navion H in the database)

                        2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0694v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1032933
                        3.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0753v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	872.7 KB
ID:	1032934

                        Thanks for your answers,
                        Best regards,
                        Yannick

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                          Hi everyone,

                          Thanks dlowwa, for your help!

                          A feedback on these three would be great. I'm not sure about horizon and contrast/soft on these.

                          1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21807[/ATTACH] (would this be ok as first reg. ? It would be the second Ryan Navion H in the database)

                          2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21808[/ATTACH]
                          3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21809[/ATTACH]

                          Thanks for your answers,
                          Best regards,
                          Yannick
                          All are dark, and a little soft. Second one might need a touch of CW, but otherwise horizon would not be an issue for me.

                          Comment


                          • Hi everyone,

                            I tried to improve no. 3 now:
                            1. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0753v5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	982.4 KB
ID:	1032957 ( I think it's now bright enough but I'm afraid it's too soft now )

                            ...And a new one for pre-screening:
                            2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0710v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,009.7 KB
ID:	1032958


                            Thanks for your answers,
                            All the best,
                            Yannick

                            PS: feel free to ignore the Piper for now, I attached it accidently and a 6th image would be out of the 24h limit
                            Attached Files
                            Last edited by YanS; 2019-02-17, 11:17. Reason: added PS

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by YanS View Post
                              Hi everyone,

                              I tried to improve no. 3 now:
                              1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21833[/ATTACH] ( I think it's now bright enough but I'm afraid it's too soft now )

                              ...And a new one for pre-screening:
                              2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]21834[/ATTACH]


                              Thanks for your answers,
                              All the best,
                              Yannick

                              PS: feel free to ignore the Piper for now, I attached it accidently and a 6th image would be out of the 24h limit
                              Both look acceptable to me.

                              Comment


                              • Hi everyone,

                                Thanks dolowwa for your answer. I'll give them a chance.

                                A feedback on these would be nice:
                                1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0766v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	907.7 KB
ID:	1033017 (I had to remove some dust right over the visible contrail but I didn' want to damage the contrail. I hope it's ok this way.)
                                2.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0694 1v3.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1033018

                                Thanks for your replies,
                                Best regards,
                                Yannick

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X