Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

YanS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Now I adjusted the BA A319. Is it better now?
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 345g2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1022820

    And two new ones:
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 360g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	665.0 KB
ID:	1022821
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 361g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	670.6 KB
ID:	1022822

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi Julian,

    Thank you for your help!
    Of course there can be differences! Anything else would not be possible.
    When I ask in the forum if a rejection was worth an appeal a positive pre-screening result is a useful argument to show that my position might be not totally made up out of thin air.

    Best regards from Münster,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you very much for your help, dlowwa!
    I will try to add more contrast.

    A feedback on these would be great.
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]14255[/ATTACH] (night shot category?)
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]14256[/ATTACH]

    Thank you for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Hey

    Both look OK to me and do not need the night shot category.
    But keep in mind that there can be differences between the pre-screening and the final screening result.

    Have a nice evening, Yannick!

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you very much for your help, dlowwa!
    I will try to add more contrast.

    A feedback on these would be great.
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 358g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	912.1 KB
ID:	1022792 (night shot category?)
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 354g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1022793

    Thank you for your replies,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    Today I got this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413411 ) rejected.
    I don't really agree with the two points and as it also went through prescreening I think it's borderline.

    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the Best,
    Yannick
    I'd argue not quite backlit, but yes, does need a little more contrast I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    Today I got this picture ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413411 ) rejected.
    I don't really agree with the two points and as it also went through prescreening I think it's borderline.

    Is this one worth an appeal or do I see wrong?

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the Best,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    Would one of these work?
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13971[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13972[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13973[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13974[/ATTACH]

    Thank you for your advive,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Some softness and the first might need a bit of CW rotation, but otherwise no major issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    Would one of these work?
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 343g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	918.0 KB
ID:	1022540
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 344g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	986.4 KB
ID:	1022541
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 345g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1022542
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 346g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,010.0 KB
ID:	1022543

    Thank you for your advive,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you Julian for your feedback and congrats for beoming crew member

    I tried to improve the 737:
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13937[/ATTACH]

    And some new ones:
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13938[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13939[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13940[/ATTACH]
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13941[/ATTACH]

    Thank you for your advice,
    All the best
    Yannick
    Hoi and thank you Yannick!

    #1 OK now
    #2 too high in Frame IMO
    #3 could use more contrast but other than that it should be OK
    #4 same as #2
    #5 same as #3

    Hope this helps, have a nice evening!

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone,

    Thank you Julian for your feedback and congrats for beoming crew member

    I tried to improve the 737:
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 341g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1022507

    And some new ones:
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 337g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	837.3 KB
ID:	1022508
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 338g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	893.6 KB
ID:	1022509
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 339g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1022510
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 340g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	935.8 KB
ID:	1022511

    Thank you for your advice,
    All the best
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hello everyone,

    A pre-screen on these would be great!
    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13840[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13841[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13842[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]13843[/ATTACH]

    I'm not sure about 'Special scheme' on the Norwegian as well.

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick
    Hey

    #1 should be OK
    #2 looks a bit dark but otherwise OK (dont forget "special scheme" category)
    #3 should be OK
    #4 looks a bit unbalanced to me, try to center it a bit more (probably in 3:2 format). Otherwise no major issues IMO.

    About the "Special Scheme" on the Norwegian: Not needed here as Norwegian have different Persons on each Aircraft.

    Have a nice evening!

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    A pre-screen on these would be great!
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 332g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,018.8 KB
ID:	1022432
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 333g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	994.3 KB
ID:	1022433
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 334g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1022434
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	FullSizeRender 335g.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1022435

    I'm not sure about 'Special scheme' on the Norwegian as well.

    Thank you for your answers,
    All the best,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone

    Thank you dlowwa for your answer and also thank you to the screeners who accepted the appeal!

    Best regards,
    Yannick
    I wonder who that might have been...

    Leave a comment:


  • YanS
    replied
    Hi everyone

    Thank you dlowwa for your answer and also thank you to the screeners who accepted the appeal!

    Best regards,
    Yannick

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YanS View Post
    Hi everyone!

    Thank you dlowwa for your help! No, photos were not taken through terminal-glass, just through very cold austrian air

    Today this ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6372670 ) was screened after only two days what is really awsome () and rejected for being backlit. As it went through pre-screening I think it is atleast borderline.
    Would this one be worth an appeal?
    Borderline, but not really backlit imho. I would accept the appeal, but can't guarantee the other senior screeners would.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X