Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, can you please pre-screen this photo? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26505[/ATTACH]
    Quality looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen these 3 photos. Thanks again =)
    1. ok
    2. blurry
    3. borderline soft/harsh contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, this one rejected due to overexposure: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7418569

    Is it enough or need a bit more:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26411[/ATTACH]
    Borderline, but would be ok for me.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, are these 3 ok for contrast and exposure? Thanks again for the feedback!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26413[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26414[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26415[/ATTACH]
    All three borderline harsh contrast/overexposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, this one rejected due to undershap: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7415557#

    Acceptable now? Thanks

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26380[/ATTACH]
    Looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Thanks again for the feedback dlowwa.

    Just a quick clarification, do you consider any of these night shot? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26358[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26359[/ATTACH]
    Could be. Borderline enough you can leave a note saying you are unsure and if everything else is ok with the image, the screener will fix it for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Rodeback
    replied
    These aren't night shots. The shadows aren't long and there is no red-orange glow.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew,
    This one was rejected (second time) for Undersharpened (Soft) (first time rejected was due to contrast issues only): https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7409060
    Is it really soft or is it worth appealing?

    If it's really soft, is it better now:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26342[/ATTACH]

    Thanks!
    Both images are soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, your opinion on these 3 please (contrast issues?):

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26232[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26233[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26234[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline overexposed
    2. contrast
    3. ok

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    About the second and third, are they considered night shot? Thanks!
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, your opinion on these 2 please:

    1. Contrast/exposure opinion, still very bordeline?
    Yes.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    2. Contrast/heat haze issues? Thanks!!
    I see a bit, but would be passable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, can i get your opinion on these 3 especially if heat haze is a relevant issue:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26107[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26108[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26109[/ATTACH]

    Also, any chance on this one? I know about the poor light but it's a rare opportunity to photograph the Dash in this slot position. Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26110[/ATTACH]
    1-3 yes borderline heat hazed
    4. very borderline contrast/overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello, can i get JP crew opinion on this one (especially horizon - levelled by the verticals on top center):

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26047[/ATTACH]

    Also these 2 (especially contrast/exposure and shapness, is it acceptable?) Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26048[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26051[/ATTACH]
    1. probably needs a touch of CW
    2. borderline (harsh) contrast
    3. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!
    These 2 were rejected due to contrast issues:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7385567
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7383540

    The corrected versions:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25978[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25979[/ATTACH]

    Any chance of getting accepted? Thanks
    Contrast a bit harsh on both, but borderline acceptable, for me at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, are these 5 acceptable on JP database? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25946[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25947[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25948[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25949[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25950[/ATTACH]
    1. horizon, borderline heat haze
    2. backlit
    3-4 borderline overexposed/contrast
    5. borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Dlowwa about the 3rd, the obstruction is the pushback car, part of the motive of the photo, it is really a rejection motive in this case? Other photos have been accepted with this "obstruction". I just want to understand the JP screeners opinion on this type of obstruction.
    Looks like it's parked, in which case there is no 'scene', just obstruction. If it were actually towing the aircraft, different story.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Any better this one?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25884[/ATTACH]
    No. Not sure this one is fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, are these 4 acceptable on JP database? about the first two, possible overexposure a relevant issue? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25850[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25851[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25852[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25853[/ATTACH]
    1. overexposed
    2. overexposed, soft
    3. obstruction, borderline contrast
    4. contrast

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X