Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello Screeners, when possible can you give me your opinion on this one and the photo on the last post? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25640[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast, soft/heat haze
    2. borderline contrast/backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello dlowwa, i know the light was bad but this one is probably the flight of the year here on the island, 75 years old modified Douglas DC-3 =)
    Any chance to get accepted?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25503[/ATTACH]
    That would almost certainly be a contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello dlowwa, thanks for the advice, i'll try to keep it on f/8 or above.

    Can i ask your opinion on these 4? Acceptable? Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25418[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25419[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25420[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25421[/ATTACH]
    1. color (use sRGB please), borderline contrast
    2. ok
    3. borderline contrast/overexposure
    4. vignetting

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello, first time getting "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue) on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7336979
    I've read some posts about this rejection on JP Forum but not sure if it applies in this case. Any easy way to see it and correct it on photoshop?
    I've corrected the exposure and tried to correct vignetting, any way to get accepted?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25320[/ATTACH]
    Think the color looks weird because the fuselage is mostly blown out (and the harsh contrast). Fix those issues, and maybe the color won't be a problem.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, Is vignetting a problem on these 3? Thanks!
    I would consider it a borderline issue, yes. It is noticeable, though can't say for certain whether it would cause a rejection. Trying stopping down your aperture a bit to alleviate the effect. f/6.3 is probably wider than it needs to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello, are these 2 acceptable on JP database?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25291[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25292[/ATTACH]

    Thanks!
    1. borderline dark/contrast
    2. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva

    About the last one, it's military and can transport passengers and cargo, like most of military airplanes.
    Then 'Cargo' category applies.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, regarding to "hot photos", first photo of A319 9H-TLS was uploaded today to JP database, if i photograph and upload tomorrow is it still acceptable as "hot photo"?
    Unless there is some other reason, only the first image of a reg. is considered hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello,

    I've worked on these 2, any improved chances to get accepted?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25267[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25268[/ATTACH]
    1. noisy, borderline blurry/oversharpened/contrast
    2. borderline blurry/compression. are you sure the original is not blurry?

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, this one was rejected due to categories wrong or missing: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7320917
    The only category check is military, none of the other apply in this case. What's wrong or missing?
    Military is the genre, not a category. Is this not a cargo aircraft?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Is this one better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25227[/ATTACH]
    Better, yes. Acceptable? Borderline soft.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, are these ok for upload? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25228[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25229[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25230[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline overexposed
    2. noisy, borderline dark/contrast
    3. borderline overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello again!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 3 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25189[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25190[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25191[/ATTACH]
    1. blurry, compression
    2. borderline vignetting
    3. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    This one was rejected due to "overexposed": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7329146

    Is it really overexposed? How can i confirm this overexposure in the histogram? I'm not really seeing the overexposure problem.
    I reduced a bit the exposure, is it better?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25156[/ATTACH]

    Also this one, rejected due to overexposed and contrast issues: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7329311

    Better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25157[/ATTACH]

    Thanks!
    Both rejected images show a small spike on the far right of the histogram, which would mean they technically have a small area that is blown out. Both improved images would be borderline acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello dlowwa.

    Can you please help me with this one, rejected due to contrast issues, i've work again with histogram, what do you think? if not good, is it fixable? how?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25011[/ATTACH]

    Also can you give your opinion on these ones. Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25012[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25013[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25014[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25015[/ATTACH]
    All borderline (but not too bad) for contrast. Also some vignetting on 2 & 5. 1 would be (just) ok for me at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 5 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24796[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24806[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24798[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24799[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24800[/ATTACH]
    1, 3 ok
    2, 4 borderline contrat (and terrible angle on 2)
    5 borderline oversharpened, maybe some blur

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    The first was soft and dark, is it better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24720[/ATTACH]

    Also, is this one ok? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24721[/ATTACH]
    1. very noisy, borderline oversharpened. quality is not there for 1600
    2. backlit, noisy, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 5 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24671[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24672[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24673[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24674[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24675[/ATTACH]
    1. soft, dark
    2. soft
    3. borderline vignetting
    4-5 borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello again!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 2 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks =)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24619[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24620[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast, soft
    2. vignetting, borderline soft

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X