Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eduardo Paixão Silva - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaHello JP Crew, this one ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7555015 ) was rejected due to Contrast too strong. Is it enough my correction:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28374[/ATTACH]
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaAlso, this one ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7552710 ) was rejected due to Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue) and Too much or too little contrast, is it acceptable now:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28375[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaHello dlowwa, i've worked again these 2 photos, please pre-screen them when possible. Thanks!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28423[/ATTACH]
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva[ATTACH=CONFIG]28424[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaHello JP Crew, this one (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7563874) rejected due to Dark / Underexposed and Undersharpened (Soft), is it acceptable now:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28534[/ATTACH]
Thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaHello JP Crew, please pre-screen these 2 photos:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28695[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28696[/ATTACH]
About the last one, is this crop acceptable? objective is to focus on the fixed damages on the fuselage.
Thanks!
2. some chromatic aberration visible, but probably not enough for a rejection
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaHello dlowwa and other JP Screeners. About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7690802
One of the reasons to select "Hot photo" is, according to JP upload guidelines, "3. First appearance of a new airline colour scheme". As it happened with registrations CS-TRD,CS-TRG and CS-TRF, this rejected photo has indeed a different color scheme, same major design but the blue tones are not the same and there are also different details, so it does aplyes for "Hot Photo".
All these years i've been trying my best to get my photos accepted on your database, always respecting your decisions even when i don't agree with some of them, but always with the necessary respect.
Today, after appeal for this rejection, the admin comment was just "Right......". This is not an acceptable way to speak with no one, even less with someone who have contribute with JP for so long.
I understand the light conditions weren't the best but the feeling i have is that this admin was, at least, calling me a liar. I felt offended and I think I deserve an apology by that administrator and i kindly ask this appeal to be analyze by other screener, please.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão SilvaI appreciate your answer dlowwa, it's the respectful way we speak to each other that makes all the difference.
When possible, about this 2 rejections due to "Dark / Underexposed" and "Too much or too little contrast" ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7671822 ; https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7671166 ), are they acceptable now? Thanks
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29666[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29667[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Hello JP Screeners. First of all, congratulations for the forum upgrade, i like the new design.
So, about this rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7718497 ) due to contrast issues. I know about the bad conditions of light but i just upload it because it's a new registration. As you know better than me, sometimes photos with these weather conditions are accepted so i gave it a try. Personally i think it's ok for contrast but if Screeners are right is it fixable? Does it need more or less contrast? Any help with the edition is welcome. Thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View PostHello JP Screeners. First of all, congratulations for the forum upgrade, i like the new design.
So, about this rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7718497 ) due to contrast issues. I know about the bad conditions of light but i just upload it because it's a new registration. As you know better than me, sometimes photos with these weather conditions are accepted so i gave it a try. Personally i think it's ok for contrast but if Screeners are right is it fixable? Does it need more or less contrast? Any help with the edition is welcome. Thanks!
Comment
Comment