Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Crew, this one (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7546773) was rejected due to Undersharpened (Soft), is it acceptable now:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28228[/ATTACH]

    Thanks!
    No, noisy and still soft/blurry. Doesn't look like the quality is there for this one.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
      Hello JP Crew, when possible, please pre-screen these 2 photos. Thanks again!

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]28315[/ATTACH]

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]28316[/ATTACH]
      Would be ok for me.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Hello JP Crew, this one ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7555015 ) was rejected due to Contrast too strong. Is it enough my correction:

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28374[/ATTACH]
        Don't see a big difference between the two, tbh.

        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Also, this one ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7552710 ) was rejected due to Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue) and Too much or too little contrast, is it acceptable now:

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28375[/ATTACH]
        Again, not a huge difference, and the color actually seems a bit worse (more green).

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          Hello dlowwa, i've worked again these 2 photos, please pre-screen them when possible. Thanks!

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]28423[/ATTACH]
          Looks nearly identical to the rejected image.

          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]28424[/ATTACH]
          Color would be ok for me.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
            Hello JP Crew, this one (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7563874) rejected due to Dark / Underexposed and Undersharpened (Soft), is it acceptable now:

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28534[/ATTACH]

            Thanks!
            Borderline for the contrast/exposure, and actually looks like it might be a bit blurry. How is the original?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
              Also, can you please pre-screen this one too:

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]28566[/ATTACH]

              Thanks!
              Borderline contrast, but ok for me.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen these 2 photos:

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]28695[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]28696[/ATTACH]

                About the last one, is this crop acceptable? objective is to focus on the fixed damages on the fuselage.

                Thanks!
                1. probably want to place it a bit higher in the frame
                2. some chromatic aberration visible, but probably not enough for a rejection

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                  Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen this photo:

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]29064[/ATTACH]

                  Thanks!
                  Borderline for contrast/glare, and maybe soft.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                    Hello JP, about this photo, is it considered backlit?
                    No.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                      Hello dlowwa and other JP Screeners. About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7690802
                      One of the reasons to select "Hot photo" is, according to JP upload guidelines, "3. First appearance of a new airline colour scheme". As it happened with registrations CS-TRD,CS-TRG and CS-TRF, this rejected photo has indeed a different color scheme, same major design but the blue tones are not the same and there are also different details, so it does aplyes for "Hot Photo".
                      All these years i've been trying my best to get my photos accepted on your database, always respecting your decisions even when i don't agree with some of them, but always with the necessary respect.
                      Today, after appeal for this rejection, the admin comment was just "Right......". This is not an acceptable way to speak with no one, even less with someone who have contribute with JP for so long.
                      I understand the light conditions weren't the best but the feeling i have is that this admin was, at least, calling me a liar. I felt offended and I think I deserve an apology by that administrator and i kindly ask this appeal to be analyze by other screener, please.
                      I didn't handle the original rejection or the appeal, and maybe it's just the light in your image, but I personally can't see any noticeable difference between this and the previously accepted, and I guess neither did the other screeners.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                        I appreciate your answer dlowwa, it's the respectful way we speak to each other that makes all the difference.

                        When possible, about this 2 rejections due to "Dark / Underexposed" and "Too much or too little contrast" ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7671822 ; https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7671166 ), are they acceptable now? Thanks

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29666[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29667[/ATTACH]
                        Contrast is a little harsh on both, although the first (rejected) would have been ok for me (if you appealed as well). The second is a bit more borderline so I would pass on that one if appealed. The improved versions are brighter, but still have harsh contrast, especially the second.

                        Comment


                        • Hello JP Screeners. First of all, congratulations for the forum upgrade, i like the new design.
                          So, about this rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7718497 ) due to contrast issues. I know about the bad conditions of light but i just upload it because it's a new registration. As you know better than me, sometimes photos with these weather conditions are accepted so i gave it a try. Personally i think it's ok for contrast but if Screeners are right is it fixable? Does it need more or less contrast? Any help with the edition is welcome. Thanks!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
                            Hello JP Screeners. First of all, congratulations for the forum upgrade, i like the new design.
                            So, about this rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7718497 ) due to contrast issues. I know about the bad conditions of light but i just upload it because it's a new registration. As you know better than me, sometimes photos with these weather conditions are accepted so i gave it a try. Personally i think it's ok for contrast but if Screeners are right is it fixable? Does it need more or less contrast? Any help with the edition is welcome. Thanks!
                            Don't think this is fixable.

                            Comment


                            • Hello JP Screeners, please pre-screen these photos. Thanks!


                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
                                Hello JP Screeners, please pre-screen these photos. Thanks!

                                These are all very likely contrast rejections.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X