Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paixão Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello! Are these three better for upload? Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20704[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20705[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20706[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline heat haze/harsh contrast
    2. cut off
    3. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 5 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20675[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20676[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20677[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20678[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20679[/ATTACH]
    1, 3: a bit underexposed and lacking contrast, too high in the frame
    2: maybe a tad too dark
    4, 5: OK

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Hi,
    1) ok as a ramp shot
    2) ok
    3) ok (don't forget special scheme + night shot category)
    4) Size not ok (too square)
    5) questionnable contrast

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Is this one ok for upload? Thanks and Merry Christmas to all JP Crew!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20636[/ATTACH]
    Contrast is a little harsh, but would be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 2 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20551[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20552[/ATTACH]
    1. dark/contrast
    2. borderline dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello, this one was rejected due to "Similar photo uploaded": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6948319

    I have appealed and the answer was "Several similar images actually." This is not true. According to JP definition of similar photo, this is not similar because this photo was taken from a different position/angle and different moment/day. I don't have any photo this close to the aircraft taken from this angle at this airport. Screener must be confusing with photos taken at other airports.

    Any JP screener can recheck this one please? Thanks!
    Hi,

    These would all be considered similar:

    Named "Flores".. CS-TRF. Bombardier Dash 8-Q402. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

    Named "Flores". [1400px]. CS-TRF. Bombardier Dash 8-Q402. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

    Named "Flores".. CS-TRF. Bombardier Dash 8-Q402. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!


    Images do not need to be from the same date to be considered similar, nor do they need to show exactly the same background/angle - they must simply appear similar. We'd prefer a separation of more than 3-4 years between images for the different date to be a reason not to be considered similar. Your images are all from the past year or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 2 photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19952[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19953[/ATTACH]
    1. soft, compression, noise, borderline dark/contrast
    2. borderline contrast

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    i know the weather was not the best on this one but any chance being accepted?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19963[/ATTACH]
    Likely rejected for contrast, soft, and noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19920[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19921[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19922[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19923[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19924[/ATTACH]
    Last two are a bit dark, otherwise don't see any major issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!
    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18963[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18964[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18965[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18966[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18967[/ATTACH]
    1. exposure, contrast, color
    2. soft/blurry, color
    3-4 ok
    5. borderline dark/harsh contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18892[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18893[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18894[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline heat haze
    2. dark, contrast
    3. borderline dark, almost backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello dlowwa.
    But is it fixable by increasing contrast?
    Is it better or not fixable?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18774[/ATTACH]

    Thanks as always for your help!
    I'd say probably not, but it would be up to whoever ended up screening it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!
    Is this one ok for upload? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18772[/ATTACH]
    Borderline contrast due to majority of aircraft visible being in shadow.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18744[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18745[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18746[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18747[/ATTACH]
    1. dark, noisy/compression
    2-3 Ok
    4. borderline noise/compression

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!
    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18711[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18712[/ATTACH]

    About the last one, is it considered "similar photo" to this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8414339


    Thanks again!
    1. soft, color, borderline contrast
    2. color, overexposed. not similar

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva
    Hello!

    Rejected due to "Too much or too little contrast": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6784686

    Can any JP screener help me with this one, is this rejection valid? should i appeal or does it need more or less contrast?

    Also can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks again!!!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18551[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18552[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18553[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18554[/ATTACH]
    Might want to double check the horizon on the third one, otherwise quality looks ok.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X