Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello again, can i have JP crew opinion on these two please. Thanks! (the airbus 320 color is white pearl except the nose)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12389[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12390[/ATTACH]
    First is ok; potential contrast issues on second as most of the aircraft is in shadow.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello dlowwa, my request was accepted and i have uploaded the first photo as 1600x, hope it will be accepted =)

    I tried to fix the next ones (the first was soft, the others borderline dark/contrast):

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12349[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12350[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12351[/ATTACH]

    Also are these two ok? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12357[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12358[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. blurry, noisy/compression
    3. contrast, color, soft
    4. ok
    5. cut off/motive

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos. The first is 1920x, is quality acceptable or better upload lower resolution? The third is a night shot.
    Thanks and merry christmas to all JP crew!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12309[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12310[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12333[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12312[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12313[/ATTACH]
    1-2 ok
    3-5 borderline dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello and thank you for the quick answer. I reduce the resolution and tried to fix the issues, are these ones acceptable?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12273[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12274[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12275[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12276[/ATTACH]
    Some softness on the first still (probably low DOF), and the last one a bit. Otherwise ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Are these ones 1920x quality acceptable or better upload 1280x?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12266[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12272[/ATTACH]


    Thanks and merry christmas to all JP crew!
    1 soft
    2 heat distortion

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello LX-A343, i increased contrast on the first one, is it better? Fixable? Thanks for the help.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12248[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12253[/ATTACH]
    I am afraid these have a contrast issue, both look very backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12242[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12243[/ATTACH]
    1: contrast
    2: a little bit dark and slightly vignetting

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello.

    This one was rejected due to Dark/Underexposed and Undersharpened (Soft) (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6178627). Is it better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11196[/ATTACH]

    Rejected due to Undersharpened (Soft) (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6181312). Is it better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11197[/ATTACH]

    Rejected due to contrast issues and Undersharpened (Soft) (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6179947). Is it better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11198[/ATTACH]

    Can i also have your opinion on these two:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11201[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11200[/ATTACH]
    1. I see noise being an issue where you've tried to sharpen & brighten it
    2. also quite noisy
    3. not really. contrast and noisy rejection likely
    4. contrast
    5. contrast, noise, heat distortion

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello JP Screeners!

    This one was rejected due to contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6168015 )

    Is it better now:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10934[/ATTACH]
    Contrast shouldn't be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!
    Is this one acceptable due to the position of the van?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10882[/ATTACH]

    and about this one:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10900[/ATTACH]

    Thanks!
    1. is obstructed
    2. looks acceptable

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello Andrťs.

    Unfortunately the ATR cockpit is really small and with my 18mm lens i couldn't do better. After leveling horizon this is the best crop i can get. No buttons were cut off on the upper area.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10777[/ATTACH]

    This is another shot but with papers obstructing

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10778[/ATTACH]
    Borderline for crop and noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    JP screeners can I get your opinion on this one please. Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10750[/ATTACH]
    Do you have a wider shot? I know with 18mm itīs hard but do you have any shot without cropping the autopilot control panel (upper area)

    Cheers!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello dlowwa, thanks once again for you feedback.
    I tried to correct contrast and softness issues on these ones, what do you think:
    1. soft, very poor contrast. probably best to give up on this one.
    2. heat haze still borderline noticeable
    3. soft and poor contrast.

    If I were you, I'd probably try to consider the conditions more when thinking about which images you want to upload. Poor conditions will always make it more challenging to get an image accepted, and sometimes not be worth the effort.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10680[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10681[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10682[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10683[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10684[/ATTACH]
    Hi,

    1. ok
    2. heat haze, oversharpened/compression
    3. ok
    4. technically backlit, but probably ok
    5. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!







    Attached Files
Working...
X